pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: pcplantdb
List archive
- From: Richard Archer <pcplantdb@juggernaut.com.au>
- To: pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 06:28:41 +1000
At 5:27 PM +0100 8/9/04, Richard Morris wrote:
>plants can implement. Or maybe don't use the concept tree at all, stick
>to the constituent parts, such a woody, perennial, not branching at base
> and fits a particular ecological niche.
I agree. As far as the PIW project is concerned the scientific name of
a plant is only relevant once someone wants to order the plant from a
nursery. Until then, people will be searching on form and function to
identify the plant or group of plants they want to use.
Common names are even more useless!
...R.
-
[pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Richard Morris, 09/08/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/08/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Richard Archer, 09/08/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/08/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?, Richard Archer, 09/08/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] common names,
John Schinnerer, 09/09/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] common names, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/09/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/08/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
John Schinnerer, 09/09/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Richard Morris, 09/09/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
John Schinnerer, 09/09/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Plants For A Future, 09/12/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Scott Pittman, 09/12/2004
- Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 09/12/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Scott Pittman, 09/12/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Plants For A Future, 09/12/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
John Schinnerer, 09/09/2004
-
Re: [pcplantdb] What is a tree?,
Richard Morris, 09/09/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.