Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - Re: [NAFEX] Himalayan blackberry - Why it is called Himalayan.

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Michael Dossett <phainopepla@yahoo.com>
  • To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Himalayan blackberry - Why it is called Himalayan.
  • Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:06:37 -0700 (PDT)

I intimated a little bit about this the other day in
my post....

>From Jennings. 1988. Raspberries and Blackberries,
their diseases breeding and growth:

Rubus procerus [aremeniacus] is native to northern
Iran, from where it has spread across southern Europe
to France. Its occurrence in Britain and other parts
is almost certainly due to escape from gardens, and
though Watson (1958) noted that it was identical with
R. thyrsoides, which was collected at Holyhead in 1895
and in Cornwall in 1904, he considered that it was
most unlikely to be native to Britain. It is said to
have been a troublesome weed in New Zealand since
before 1895. Luther Burbank introduced a cultivar of
it to America in 1885 under the name "Himalaya Giant",
believing that it was derived from seed obtained from
Asian mountains. This name is now used almost
exclusively for all cultivated forms, though they are
probably all derived from the stock that Theodor
Reimers of Hamburg introduced into Germany about
1889...

It goes on a little further to talk about the
weediness, range in North America, range of variation
(which is surprising considering it is an apomictic
species) and it's fruit quality. So there you have
it. In my opinion Burbank's assumption as to the
plant's origin wasn't a terrible one. China and Asia
appear to be the main center of Rubus diversity in the
world.

Michael




--- Douglas Woodard <dwoodard@becon.org> wrote:

> Full name "Himalayan Giant" also used in U.K. for
> many years.
>
> As to "why": many nurserymen will use any name that
> sells sometimes
> regardless of what the plant is. There is and has
> long been a very wide
> range of ethical standards in the business. Maybe it
> was thought to have
> associations of bigness of fruit because of the size
> of the Himalayan
> mountains.
>
> I think we might have to wait on some scholar who
> has access to old
> catalogues and horticultural literature to do
> literature research.
>
> Doug Woodard
> St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
>
>
> Dr. Chiranjit Parmar wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I saw all my books/floras on Himalayan plants. I
> did not find it listed
> > anywhere. So I do not think that it is plant from
> Himalayan region,
> > even from India.
> >
> > Why it has been named as Himalayan blackberry in
> USA.
> >
> > Dr. Chiranjit Parmar
> > www.fruitipedia.com <http://www.fruitipedia.com>
> _______________________________________________
> nafex mailing list
> nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
>
> Reproduction of list messages or archives is not
> allowed.
> This includes distribution on other email lists or
> reproduction on web sites.
> Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't
> claim you have permission!
>
> **YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
> Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed
> are discarded.
> No exceptions.
> ----
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of
> this page (also can be used to change other email
> options):
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex
>
> File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
> TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER
> VIRUSES!
> Please do not send binary files.
> Use plain text ONLY in emails!
>
> NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/
>


Michael Dossett
Corvallis, Oregon
www.Mdossettphoto.com
phainopepla@yahoo.com



____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page