Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - Re: [NAFEX] Fwd: Organic Farming Tops in Soil-Building

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mark & Helen Angermayer" <hangermayer@isp.com>
  • To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Fwd: Organic Farming Tops in Soil-Building
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:54:15 -0500

Title: Message
Could also depend on the lay of the land.  When we lived in Missouri, there was a lot of productive ground that had slope, as ours did.  We purposely rented our ground to a no-till farmer to minimize soil erosion.  Our neighbor with similar sloped ground did conventional tillage and eventually the ground became so eroded he had to pasture it.  I like the idea of building soil by plowing in cover crops, but for sloped ground or areas with minimal rainfall, no till has its place.
 
Mark
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Fwd: Organic Farming Tops in Soil-Building

Ron, I really wonder whether the findings would be the same in a region where the climate and crop grown are markedly different than at Beltsville.  For example, small grains grown under a summer fallow rotation. -- Sam Brungardt, St. Paul, Minn.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: nafex-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:nafex-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Lon J. Rombough
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:22 AM
To: NAFEX
Subject: [NAFEX] Fwd: Organic Farming Tops in Soil-Building

Slightly off topic, but still applicable to orchards in some ways.


Begin forwarded message:

From: ARS News Service <NewsService@ars.usda.gov>
Date: July 10, 2007 6:57:35 AM PDT
To: ARS News subscriber <lonrom@hevanet.com>
Subject: Organic Farming Tops in Soil-Building
Reply-To: ARS News Service <NewsService@ars.usda.gov>

STORY LEAD:
Organic Farming Beats No-Till?
___________________________________________

ARS News Service
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
Don Comis, (301) 504-1625, donald.comis@ars.usda.gov
July 10, 2007
--View this report online, plus photos and related stories, at www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr
___________________________________________

Organic farming can build up soil organic matter better than conventional no-till farming can, according to a long-term study by Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists.

Researchers made this discovery during a nine-year study at the Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC), Beltsville, Md. BARC is operated by ARS, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief scientific research agency.

Plant physiologist John Teasdale, with the ARS Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory in Beltsville, was surprised to find that organic farming was a better soil builder than no-till. No-till has always been thought to be the best soil builder because it eliminates plowing and minimizes even light tillage to avoid damaging organic matter and exposing the soil to erosion.

Organic farming, despite its emphasis on building organic matter, was thought to actually endanger soil because it relies on tillage and cultivation--instead of herbicides--to kill weeds.

But Teasdale's study showed that organic farming's addition of organic matter in manure and cover crops more than offset losses from tillage.

From 1994 to 2002, Teasdale compared light-tillage organic corn, soybean and wheat with the same crops grown with no-till plus pesticides and synthetic fertilizers.

In a follow-up three-year study, Teasdale grew corn with no-till practices on all plots to see which ones had the most-productive soils. He found that the organic plots had more carbon and nitrogen and yielded 18 percent more corn than the other plots did.

Read more about the research in the July 2007 issue of Agricultural Research magazine, available online at:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/AR/archive/jul07/soil0707.htm

___________________________________________

This is one of the news reports that ARS Information distributes to subscribers on weekdays. Send feedback and questions to the ARS News Service at NewsService@ars.usda.gov.

* To change the address, please notify the ARS News Service at NewsService@ars.usda.gov.
* To unsubscribe, send a blank email to leave-129030-22236Y@ls.ars.usda.gov.
* Other ARS news products are available by e-mail. For details about them or to subscribe, please contact the ARS News Service or visit http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/lists.htm.
__________________________________________
ARS News Service, Information Staff, Agricultural Research Service
5601 Sunnyside Ave., Room 1-2251, Beltsville MD 20705-5128
NewsService@ars.usda.gov | www.ars.usda.gov/news
Phone (301) 504-1638 | fax (301) 504-1486


_______________________________________________
nafex mailing list
nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web sites.
Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have permission!

**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
No exceptions. 
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used to change other email options):
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex

File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!

NAFEX web site:   http://www.nafex.org/


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/894 - Release Date: 7/10/07 5:44 PM



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page