nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: tanis grif <tanisgrif@yahoo.com>
- To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [NAFEX] burning horse manure
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:22:32 -0800 (PST)
Burning might be the best option if he can't afford to
have it hauled or treat it as waste, his insurance
won't allow him to have gardeners come get pickup
truckfuls, he has no fields to spread it on/ no equip
to spread it with, or if he knows it is contaminated
with bad weeds or disease. Why the selling-feature
"the ash is a rich fertilizer", since the manure was a
rich fertilizer to start with?
--- lee reich <> wrote:
> You're right, it is a waste of nitrogen and bulk.
> Potash and other minerals would remain.
>
> Lee Reich
> www.leereich.com
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2005, at 7:05 PM, breezyhill wrote:
>
> > Someone I know is burning an accumulation of
> horse manure rather than
> > composting it. He has been told that this produces
> a very rich
> > fertilizer. I am aghast. Surely all of the lovely
> N and soil
> > conditioning properties are lost. Would there be
> anything left except potash?
> >
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
-
[NAFEX] burning horse manure,
breezyhill, 01/31/2005
-
Re: [NAFEX] burning horse manure,
lee reich, 01/31/2005
- Re: [NAFEX] burning horse manure, tanis grif, 01/31/2005
- Re: [NAFEX] burning horse manure, list, 01/31/2005
-
Re: [NAFEX] burning horse manure,
lee reich, 01/31/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.