North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

[Leo Manuel <leom@rarefruit.com>]

Hi David


If I have 300 dpi and a large photo size, and print it,
import it into MSWord, or whatever, where the graphic
gets scaled to fit, the detail is much better, than if 
I use a small photo, which when scaled, will spread those
pixels out, with much poorer detail. The more crowded those
pixels (or whatever they are called) the more information
per square inch is contained, the better the detail. I 
have used 18 x 18 inches, with the particular size not
important.  It's just that beginning with a larger photo
(scanned document, etc.) the greater the clarity.

Test this, but it's what I've observed with my equipment.
The trouble with large graphics is that they are difficult
to transmit electronically.

I'd be interested in whether this is consistent with the
experiences of others.

Horticordially,

Leo Manuel   http://www.rarefruit.com   leom@rarefruit.com


> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:06:46 -0500
> From: "David Doud" <doudone@netusa1.net>
> 
> I've also talked to a fellow who has considerably more experience and he 
> said
> that the size of the originals is an important consideration - a 2"X3" or an
> 8"X10" original,  300 dpi offers a lot more info out of an 8X10 - I hope
> that a real 'expert' will chime in - DOUD
>From efackler@woh.rr.com  Wed Feb 19 17:44:01 2003
Return-Path: <efackler@woh.rr.com>
Delivered-To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from ohsmtp01.ogw.rr.com (ohsmtp01.ogw.rr.com [65.24.7.36])
        by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1BC2001C
        for <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:44:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from anonymous2112 (dhcp065-031-058-065.woh.rr.com [65.31.58.65])
        by ohsmtp01.ogw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h1JMjEaG005434
        for <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:45:14 -0500 (EST)
From: "Ed Fackler" <efackler@woh.rr.com>
To: "NAFEX Greetings:" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:45:33 -0500
Message-ID: <KPENKALHIDMLCHGPDECIIEINCBAA.efackler@woh.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
Subject: [NAFEX] RE: Shiawassee Apple
X-BeenThere: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Id: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex>,
        <mailto:nafex-request@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/nafex>
List-Post: <mailto:nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex>,
        <mailto:nafex-request@lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 22:44:01 -0000

I have the Shiawassee apple--2 trees.  It is a fairly flat apple with much
red striping.  I think its flavor is unique and remarkably good.  The trees
have not born well but maybe that is my fault.  I bought the trees in 1986
from a souce no longer selling trees.  If you want scionwood, you can have
all you want.

Gene Wild