msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Mounted search and rescue
List archive
[MSAR] MSAR as patient transport / MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3
- From: "Jorene Downs" <Jorene@CEOates.com>
- To: "'Mounted search and rescue'" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [MSAR] MSAR as patient transport / MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:25:29 -0700
Irv, if you ever have this training and disagree with it, you’re
welcome to take on both the National Park Service (Mounted Officers and volunteer
Mounted SAR) and US Marine Corps who teach and use this training. No,
you don’t put someone with possible spinal injury on a horse’s
saddle to transport. It’s all part of the training, and also why nobody should
be performing this kind of process without having that training. ;-) You should also keep in perspective that many SAR teams
have First Aid as highest level of medical training. Some areas don’t
even teach or require litter carry training, much less require that every team
carry a litter into the field. Also recall that many “found” people
don’t need much more than some food and water and being assisted back to
civilization. Higher medical training and related equipment is more
commonly found in the technical teams, where the potential for a rescue with
injury is higher. - - - - - - Jorene Downs SAR & CERT Mounted SAR From: IRVIN LICHTENSTEIN The first
rule is do no harm. Almost all first aid training and higher levels of
skill preach no to move a injured person if there is an alternative and not to
lift or carry without a stretcher. While we could drag a person on a tarp
or in a coat across a floor or a paved highway to remove them from immediate
danger you would not want to do so for miles of unimproved horse trail. Putting
a person erect in the saddle without being able to definitively clear the
entire spine is asking for trouble. You can improvise a litter from
branches and cloth or rope if necessary but the extrication team should have
the proper equipment to move the patient. This may be a back
packable Stokes, a long or short backboard, CID, and splints. We
must distinguish here between a professional search operation extricating a
subject or searcher and a group of riders self helping or self rescuing
themselves. In the first case the proper skills, certifications, and
equipment should be available promptly. In the second case there are no
skills, no equipment, and the closest response may be hours or days away, thus
you are allowed to be ignorant. The
liability issue is moot in either case. If you do what you were trained
to do in the manner you were trained to do it and did not exceed your scope of
practice you are generally immune from damages. You are not immune from being
served. If you attempted an extrication where the urgency you perceived
required you to move the patient before proper equipment arrived or where
proper equipment was not available when it is foreseen to be needed then you
are in big trouble. The reason many doctors don’t go into the field
is that they are held to a higher performance level, and are expected to operate
in the field like they had a full hospital with them. Many states now
prohibit doctors or nurses from organized emergency response unless they have
had some training in field operations. The real
liability issue arises during training or evaluation activities. Since
these activities are planned the possibility of injury should be foreseen and
provided for. Just
having first aid kits is not enough. There should be a plan beyond
calling 9-1-1. The plan may include calling 9-1-1 but it should also include
at least basic life support. If the event is off the road but accessible
by ambulance the local dispatch center should be notified in writing before
hand with a map and access directions. If not accessible by wheeled vehicle a
carry out point or a helispot should be determined and proper equipment
deployed, and again a map prepared. Irv
Lichtenstein From:
msar-riders-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:msar-riders-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Jorene Downs Checked by AVG - www.avg.com |
-
Re: [MSAR] MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3,
Dana Mc, 07/03/2009
-
Re: [MSAR] MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3,
Jorene Downs, 07/03/2009
-
Re: [MSAR] MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3,
IRVIN LICHTENSTEIN, 07/03/2009
- [MSAR] MSAR as patient transport / MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3, Jorene Downs, 07/04/2009
-
Re: [MSAR] MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3,
IRVIN LICHTENSTEIN, 07/03/2009
-
Re: [MSAR] MSAR-Riders Digest, Vol 77, Issue 3,
Jorene Downs, 07/03/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.