msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Mounted search and rescue
List archive
- From: Una Smith <una.smith@att.net>
- To: Mounted search and rescue <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [MSAR] Horse/Member Qualification
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:12:51 -0700
Richard Judd wrote:
>How do you handle a qualified member that is unable to
>deploy with that horse and wants to use another member's
>qualified horse?
The ASTM task group writing a minimum training standard
for MSAR discussed this very issue at great length. From
that discussion, two general approaches emerged:
1. Do not allow this. Instead, recommend that members
prepare for this situation by cross-qualifying on one
another's horses. All parties being amenable to sharing,
of course.
2. Make an operational decision to allow an unqualified
pair of horse and rider, when both horse and rider have
qualified as members of another pair, and when it is
management's opinion that the new, untried pair would be
a suitable pair.
The task group chose to recommend approach #1, as being
far less subjective than #2.
Una Smith
New Mexico
-
[MSAR] Journalism and telling a story,
Lee Farren, 03/17/2005
- Re: [MSAR] Journalism and telling a story, Una Smith, 03/17/2005
-
[MSAR] Horse/Member Qualification,
Richard Judd, 03/25/2005
-
Re: [MSAR] Horse/Member Qualification,
Una Smith, 03/25/2005
- Re: [MSAR] Horse/Member Qualification, Lyne Peterson, 03/25/2005
- [MSAR] Minimum training standard, Una Smith, 03/25/2005
- Re: [MSAR] Horse/Member Qualification, Lyne, 03/25/2005
-
Re: [MSAR] Horse/Member Qualification,
Una Smith, 03/25/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [MSAR] Journalism and telling a story, Lee Farren, 03/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.