Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] Big Ag hurts the small farm

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dan Conine <dconine@bertramwireless.com>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Big Ag hurts the small farm
  • Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:23:28 -0500

From: "John D'hondt" <dhondt@eircom.net>
Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Big Ag hurts the small farm


I fear oil and big machines changed that a bit Dan. Small scale is still
more productive but not necessarily more profitable.
Yes, John, but that's only if we allow leadership to measure profits exclusively with money. When profits are measured in benefits to the future of our children, Big Ag will always come up short.
Money is king right now, but any particular empire follows a boom and bust cycle. Thanks to the cheap food of Big Ag, a lot more Petroboomer people are going to be affected when the collapse comes. That's the point that needs to be emphasized when the academic sycophants come around telling us how to care for the land.
The farmer isn't a businessman: he isn't a tool: she isn't providing food even. The farmer's primary purpose is to act as the interface between people and nature. Without farmers, everyone is at the mercy of nature's tooth and claw existence, and nature is at the mercy of Consumption Droid Industry.
Allowing a few food processing companies to pay for glorification of a few Extraction Managers (Big Farms) is a direct result of people falling for the Cheap Food is Good policies of an expansionist mindset in government.
When the expansion of the Imperialists begins to retract, we'll have to make room for a lot of people and their re-education, and even so, we won't be able to help very many at all (percentage-wise).

Dan C.

On 10/11/2013 11:00 AM, livingontheland-request@lists.ibiblio.org wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:49:30 +0100
From: "John D'hondt" <dhondt@eircom.net>
Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Big Ag hurts the small farm


I fear oil and big machines changed that a bit Dan. Small scale is still
more productive but not necessarily more profitable. A few years ago we got
a letter from our Dep. of ag. in the letterbox explaining that we should aim
to expand. An example was given from a huge beef farm where a man and wife
team rounded up 450 beef animals per week by helicopter. They made just $5
of profit per head but that still made for a few thousand $$ per week. We
were told we had to aim for something like that.
And indeed big farmers make small profits per head on huge numbers and the
whole system is further geared to benefit them. For instance, we have a
compulsory annual Tb test. A farmer with just 4 cattle will pay something
like $160 for this or $40 per head. A man with 400 cattle will pay $300 or
less than $1 per head.
No wonder so many small ones are squeezed out of business. However, if oil
gets too expensive it are the big ones that will get it in the neck while
the small farms may survive. The question is how many small farms will be
left by then though.
John







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page