Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Organic, small farmers fret over FDA regulation

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Organic, small farmers fret over FDA regulation
  • Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:20:52 -0600


This looks like a sensible writeup on the subject.

If I recall, the millionaires' Congress calls any farm grossing under
$500,000 a year "small". For any grower taking in $100,000 up, a $500 fee and
recordkeeping is hardly a crushing blow.

But in my experience, farmers' markets are mostly made up of under $10,000
farms - or far less in gross sales. And for most of the country, people have
no other source of such a diversity of fresh, local produce. Forget the
"small" up to $500,000 a year farms. WE - thousands of us market growers -
are the only practical answer to a host of major challenges, and the ONLY
way to feed people right. Or millions of inexperienced home growers can get
blisters fighting weeds and failing.

Make criminals of us and in the economy that's coming you may just go hungry.

paul tradingpost@lobo.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Organic, small farmers fret over FDA regulation
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau, April 27, 2010
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/27/MNKM1D3C5H.DTL#ixzz0mXa3rUDO

Washington -- Small farmers in California who have led a national movement
away from industrial agriculture face a looming crackdown on food safety that
they say is geared to big corporate farms and will make it harder for them to
survive.

The small growers, many of whom grow dozens of different kinds of vegetables
and fruits, say the inherent benefits of their size, and their sensitivity to
extra costs, are being ignored.

They are fighting to carve out a sanctuary in legislation that would bring
farmers under the strict purview of the Food and Drug Administration, an
agency more familiar with pharmaceuticals than food and local farms.

A bill before the Senate is riding a bipartisan groundswell created by recent
outbreaks of E. coli, salmonella and other contamination in everything from
fresh spinach to cookie dough.

And the small farmers face opponents in consumer groups, victims of food
contamination, large growers and the Obama administration, who say no farm
and no food should get a pass on safety.

An even tougher version of the legislation passed the House last summer. Now,
a behind-the-scenes battle is raging in the Senate over how to regulate small
and organic growers without ruining them - and still protect consumers.

If two versions of the overhaul pass, Congress would work to merge them.

The legislation would mandate a range of programs intended to bolster food
safety. The FDA would gain greater authority to regulate how products are
grown, stored, transported, inspected, traced from farm to table and recalled
when needed.
Pinpointing problems

But biologically diverse and organic growers argue that the problems that
have plagued the food industry lie elsewhere.

They point to the sale of bagged vegetables, cut fruit and other processed
food in which vast quantities of produce from different farms are mixed,
sealed in containers and shipped long distances, creating a host for harmful
bacteria.

The legislation does not address what some experts suspect is the source of
E. coli contamination: the large, confined animal feeding operations that are
breeding grounds for E. coli and are regulated by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, not the FDA.

Organic, small farmers fret over FDA regulation
Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau, April 27, 2010
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/27/MNKM1D3C5H.DTL#ixzz0mXa3rUDO
Washington -- Small farmers in California who have led a national movement
away from industrial agriculture face a looming crackdown on food safety that
they say is geared to big corporate farms and will make it harder for them to
survive.

The small growers, many of whom grow dozens of different kinds of vegetables
and fruits, say the inherent benefits of their size, and their sensitivity to
extra costs, are being ignored.

They are fighting to carve out a sanctuary in legislation that would bring
farmers under the strict purview of the Food and Drug Administration, an
agency more familiar with pharmaceuticals than food and local farms.

A bill before the Senate is riding a bipartisan groundswell created by recent
outbreaks of E. coli, salmonella and other contamination in everything from
fresh spinach to cookie dough.

And the small farmers face opponents in consumer groups, victims of food
contamination, large growers and the Obama administration, who say no farm
and no food should get a pass on safety.

An even tougher version of the legislation passed the House last summer. Now,
a behind-the-scenes battle is raging in the Senate over how to regulate small
and organic growers without ruining them - and still protect consumers.

If two versions of the overhaul pass, Congress would work to merge them.

The legislation would mandate a range of programs intended to bolster food
safety. The FDA would gain greater authority to regulate how products are
grown, stored, transported, inspected, traced from farm to table and recalled
when needed.
Pinpointing problems

But biologically diverse and organic growers argue that the problems that
have plagued the food industry lie elsewhere.

They point to the sale of bagged vegetables, cut fruit and other processed
food in which vast quantities of produce from different farms are mixed,
sealed in containers and shipped long distances, creating a host for harmful
bacteria.

The legislation does not address what some experts suspect is the source of
E. coli contamination: the large, confined animal feeding operations that are
breeding grounds for E. coli and are regulated by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, not the FDA.

"It does not take on the industrial animal industry and the abuses going on,"
said Tom Willey of T&D Willey Farms in Madera, an organic grower of
Mediterranean vegetables. "The really dangerous organisms we're dealing with
out here, and trying to protect our produce and other foodstuffs from, are
coming out the rear end of domestic animals."

No one in Congress or the administration has yielded in a bureaucratic turf
battle between the Department of Agriculture, which regulates meat, poultry
and eggs, and the FDA, which regulates all other food.

The controversy began with the spinach E. coli outbreak near San Juan
Bautista in 2006 that left four people dead, 35 people with acute kidney
failure and 103 hospitalized. The bacteria, known as E. coli O157:H7, first
appeared in hamburger meat in the early 1980s and migrated to produce, mainly
lettuce and other leafy greens that are cut, mixed and bagged for the
convenience of shoppers.
Contamination

Since then, there have been dozens of contamination cases, leading Congress
to rewrite food safety laws by giving much more power to the FDA. But small
growers worry that they, and consumers, will suffer in the sweep of reform.

"How do we trust that the FDA is going to know about things that the San
Francisco Bay Area has been very progressive on - the field to fork, fresh,
grow local, buy local - all of that?" said Rep. Sam Farr, D-Carmel. "The
organic people are feeling that the regulations the FDA may promulgate will
be so safety oriented, it'll put them out of business."

Consumer groups say they care about small farmers but that safety comes first.

"Our principle is that food should be safe, whatever the source," said Sandra
Eskin, director of the Pew Health Group's food safety campaign, one of the
Pew Charitable Trusts, which Monday sponsored a public meeting on the issue
with federal officials in Seaside (Monterey County).

"People care profoundly about all these issues: feeding their families, food
safety, local agriculture," Eskin said. "It's a passionate discussion and
understandably so. Everybody eats."

Tom Nassif, head of Western Growers, which represents large produce growers,
said small growers should not be exempt.

"If the small guy who sells to a farmers' market gets a family sick, it's a
blip on the radar screen," Nassif said. "There's not a big hue and cry,
because it didn't affect hundreds of people. What about those people? Doesn't
their food safety count?"
Protocols

The tension that has come with food safety reforms was on display after the
spinach outbreak rocked California. Large growers embraced costly
science-based safety protocols for all leafy greens - guidelines that federal
regulators are considering taking nationwide.

However, a UC Davis study last year by Shermain Hardesty and Yoko Kusunose
found that the rules have put smaller growers at a disadvantage because their
compliance costs are spread over fewer acres. Hardesty said costs may be as
high as $100 an acre.

Large produce buyers such as Wal-Mart and McDonald's have gone much further
than the industry standards. They have imposed rules of their own that have
forced many California farmers who supply them to fence off waterways, poison
wildlife to keep animals out of fields and destroy crop hedgerows that
support beneficial insects.

Deputy Agriculture Secretary Kathleen Merrigan said Monday the administration
is keeping a "close watch" on these so-called "super metrics," acknowledging
that they have harmed the environment but said, "nobody gets a pass on food
safety."
Increasing the danger

Willey, the Madera farmer, argued that many food safety rules tend "to push
us to embrace a paradigm of sterility," which, in the long run, increases the
danger.

"When you create microbial vacuums, they can be even more easily taken over
by pathogenic organisms," he said. "In organic agriculture, we depend
tremendously on a cooperative effort with beneficial microorganisms. My whole
soil fertility system is based on that. Actually, soil fertility planetwide
is based on that."

Efforts to modify proposed rules to make compliance easier for biologically
diversified farms have been more successful in the Senate than in the House.
New language that requires the FDA to consider farm size, crop diversity,
organic requirements and other issues has been added.

"While none of these things in themselves solves the cause for concern, they
certainly point strongly in the direction of the FDA needing to take into
account these considerations," said Ferd Hoefner, policy director for the
National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition.

Hoefner called the House bill a one-size-fits-all approach that would be a
"complete disaster" for small farms.







  • [Livingontheland] Organic, small farmers fret over FDA regulation, Tradingpost, 04/29/2010

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page