livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
Re: [Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law
- From: "Lynn Montgomery" <sunfarm@toast.net>
- To: <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:14:45 -0600
I am a holder of pre-1907 water rights in New
Mexico, which are also protected by the international Treaty of Guadalupe
Hidalgo. The state constitution in it's Bill of Rights continues these Treaty
protections. The reason that old rights get their's first is that these rights
came about through a lot of sweat, blood, and negotiation. They represent hard
won agreements between users to prevent conflict and ensure the continuation of
cultural and social values. They underpin communities and without them, the
future of these communities is dust. One should expect that one's
grandfather's farm that one is still cultivating for a living would have some
protection of the main resource that makes it all possible. I have been in
litigation all the way to the NM Supreme Court and back down to District Court
for a trial de novo, fighting new groundwater pumping that is proven, in court,
to be drying up the spring I depend on for my farm. I know the people that wrote
the editorial well, and am heartened that they have finally listened to me and
many others that seek sanity to our water uses and administration. We are going
to win. So, the little guy who is willing to stand up and sue the bastards can
win and will, that is, if one can get out of the rut that the rich and powerful
can never be beat.
Senior water rights demand
constraint in water use. Their main value is to limit how much stupidity will
get it's way. New Mexico might be considered a backward place, but our water law
is the most progressive in the nation. We even recognize that ground water and
surface water are directly connected in our law, a scientific fact known the
world over, but always denied when there is money to be made sprawling and
mauling and asphalting the Planet over. Hopefully, we can keep on beating the
heck out of the bureacracy and our bought out politicians, and with our allies
in the courts, make New Mexico a shining example of how to deal with little
water in the desert.
Lynn Montgomery, Mayordomo,
Acequia la Rosa de Castilla
Merced San Antonio de las Huertas (Spanish Land
Grant est. 1768)
Placitas, NM
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:17:27 +1200 From: Mike <mike.lists@mlxvi.org> Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law To: Healthy soil and sustainable growing <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org> Message-ID: <4887CA17.2050005@mlxvi.org">4887CA17.2050005@mlxvi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed It's pretty easy to see the many sides of this argument. But, rest assured, the final outcome will be one that benefits the government and their friends - certainly not the environment, nor the little guy. With water, it is pretty hard to argue that the guy that got here first gets it all. But equally, should someone be able to set up, knowing there is not enough water? Then you get the really stupid stuff. Entire cities being set up and promoted where there is no water, or simply not enough. Many Australian cities are like this. But, then again, if one is stupid enough to move INTO one of these cities, then what do you expect? Mike |
-
[Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law,
Tradingpost, 07/23/2008
- Re: [Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law, Mike, 07/23/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law,
Lynn Montgomery, 07/25/2008
- Re: [Livingontheland] That cruel joke called water law, Tradingpost, 07/25/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.