Nah. They're going to insert nitrogen-fixing
genes in everything.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:46
AM
Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] what's
wrong with this picture?
"In short, the world needs to produce more while conserving
more, the companys chief executive, Hugh Grant, said in a
statement."
Hey, it's like a perpetual motion machine! The more
we conserve the more we can "produce!"
Seems that minerals are missing
from this equation... Will natural gas (for nitrogen production) hold
up?
-Mark Nagel Everett, WA
>From: Tradingpost
<tradingpost@lobo.net> > >June
5, 2008 >Monsanto Plans to Boost Food Supply >By ANDREW
POLLACK >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/business/worldbusiness/05crop.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin > >Monsanto,
the leader in agricultural biotechnology, pledged Wednesday to develop seeds
that would double the yields of corn, soybeans and cotton by 2030 and would
require 30 percent less water, land and energy to grow. > >The
announcement, coming as world leaders are meeting in Rome to discuss rising
food prices and growing food shortages, appears to be aimed at least in part
at winning acceptance of genetically modified crops by showing that they can
play a major role in feeding the world. > >Much of what is in the
commitment are things the company was doing anyway, though it now becomes a
formal goal. > >Monsanto said it had developed its new commitment
after consulting farmers, political leaders, academics and advocacy groups as
to what needed to be done to increase food production to cope with a rising
population and the demand for biofuels without converting more forests into
farmland. > >In short, the world needs to produce more while
conserving more, the companys chief executive, Hugh Grant, said in a
statement. > >How much genetic engineering, which involves adding
bacterial or other foreign genes to the DNA of plants, could contribute to
improving output is a matter of debate. > >A recent review of
agricultural technology, sponsored by the United Nations and the World Bank,
saw a very limited role. But in Rome on Tuesday, United States Secretary of
Agriculture Edward T. Schafer said biotechnology would be essential if the
world was to increase food supply by 2030 to meet rising
demand. > >Genetically modified soybeans, corn and cotton,
genetically engineered to provide herbicide tolerance, insect resistance or
both, are widely grown in the United States and several other countries. But
they are largely shunned in Europe and some other areas because of concerns
about potential environmental and health effects. > >Perhaps
seeking to avoid controversy, Monsantos announcement did not mention the term
genetic engineering. It referred instead to other technologies beyond
breeding. > >Monsantos goal of doubling yields by 2030 over
levels in 2000 might require a sharp acceleration in the rate by which
agricultural productivity has been increasing. James E. Specht, a soybean
genetics expert at the University of Nebraska, said he doubted it could be
done. > >The hype-to-reality ratio of that one is essentially
infinity, Mr. Specht said. Seeing an exponential change in the yield curve
is unlikely. > >Mr. Specht said that on irrigated farms in
Nebraska, soybean yields have been increasing by about 0.6 bushels an acre
every year. At that rate it would take 83 years for yields to double from the
50 bushels an acre recorded in 2000. > >But Monsanto executives
say that a new technique called marker-assisted selection could double the
rate of gain made from breeding. That technique does not involve altering
crops by putting in foreign genes. Rather it uses genetic tests to help choose
which plants to use in conventional cross-breeding, vastly speeding up the
process and improving its efficiency. > >But Monsanto executives
say genetic engineering could provide additional increases in output beyond
that. The companys insect-resistant crops already help protect corn and
cotton. And Monsanto scientists are working on genetically engineered crops
that would grow better with less water and
fertilizer. > >Moreover, the company is not talking about the
United States alone. Its said its commitment was to double the weighted
average yield of all countries with access to the companys seeds and modern
agriculture production techniques, particularly Argentina and Brazil, in
addition to the United States. > >Brazil, for instance, produces
only 58 bushels of corn an acre compared to 157 bushels in the United States.
So big gains might be made by bringing Brazil to American levels, without
having to vastly accelerate yield improvements in
Nebraska. > >Some critics of biotechnology say that genetic
engineering so far has not been shown to improve yields, though it may provide
more convenience for farmers. They also have said that the biotech crops
developed so far have mainly been aimed at feeding livestock in wealthy
countries, not improving the staple crops grown by small farmers in poor
countries. > >As part of its announcement Wednesday, Monsanto said
it would work to improve the lives of farmers, including poor ones, including
sharing its technology. It recently announced a project with some other
organizations to develop drought-tolerant corn for Africa, with Monsanto
forgoing the collection of royalties for use of its
technology. > >Also yesterday, Monsanto said it would donate $10
million over five years to public-sector programs aimed at improving yields of
wheat and rice, which are not a primary focus of the companys efforts. Much
of the breeding of those two food staples are performed by governments and
universities. > >Monsantos stock was trading at $134.76
mid-morning Wednesday, up about 1 percent. The stock has more than doubled in
the last year, in part because of soaring crop prices. Besides being a leader
in genetic engineering, Monsanto is one of the largest suppliers of seeds in
the world. It also sells the widely used herbicide Roundup, use of which has
grown with the adoption of genetically engineered crops resistant to Roundup.
_______________________________________________ Livingontheland
mailing list Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
|