internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal
- From: Mark Turner <jmarkturner AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:46:53 -0500
I disagree. IANAL, but I don't know anyone who's been thrown in jail due to an EULA violation.
See the Right of First Sale:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine
--
Mark Turner
www.markturner.net
Greg Brown wrote:
It isn't legal (per the EULA) to transfer ownership of a XP license even if that license is no longer used by the original purchaser. Last time I checked, that is.
Greg
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:40 PM, <Childers.Paula AT epamail.epa.gov <mailto:Childers.Paula AT epamail.epa.gov>> wrote:
Why isn't it legal? I thought M$ had been forced by the suckiousness of
Vista into still offering XP, as downgrade or whatever, so as long as
its a valid license and not a pirate, I would assume it's legal. Can
someone enlighten me as needed?
Paula
internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
<mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org> wrote on
01/09/2009 12:35:17
PM:
> but i need two windows XP licenses.
>
> does anyone have two that they are truly no longer using?
>
> thanks,
> stan
>
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal,
David Minton, 01/09/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal,
stan briggs, 01/09/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal,
Shawn Hartsock, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, Greg Brown, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, David Matusiak, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, G.Wolfe Woodbury, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, Jim Ray, 01/09/2009
- [internetworkers] Broadband Bullies Shouldn't Benefit From Stimulus, Christian stalberg, 01/11/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal,
Shawn Hartsock, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, stan briggs, 01/09/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal,
stan briggs, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, David Matusiak, 01/09/2009
-
Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal,
David Minton, 01/09/2009
- Re: [internetworkers] i know that it's not strictly legal, Greg Brown, 01/09/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.