Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor <evdo.hsdpa AT gmail.com>]

cat5 goes a long ways.. youll b fine

On 1/27/06, Kevin Sonney <kevin AT sonney.com> wrote:
> On 1/27/06, Lance A. Brown <lance AT bearcircle.net> wrote:
> > Would you care to elaborate on that?  "certain protocols like the ones
> > use for email"?  Like what: SMTP? IMAP? IMAPS?  POP? POPS?  Explain to
> > me how wireless messes them up.
>
> Jim can't, and wifi won't. Packets are packets, and aside from signal
> interference WiFi is perfectly reliable for home, office, or travel
> use. I know several large companies (Apple, RedHat, Cisco, and IBM for
> starters) who use Wifi extensively in their offices. Admittedly, they
> don't use WiFI for their servers, but in no way will wifi cause
> problems with the actual data protocols.
>
> Mr. Ray had a bad experience with WiFi. Since then he has consistently
> sold FUD about 802.11[a|b|g]. He has done it here, he has done it on
> other local mailing lists.
>
> I have been using WiFi for several years now. Aside from signal
> interference problems caused by non-compliant devices (2.4GhZ phones
> do NASTY things across the spectrum to maintain signals), I have not
> had data loss due to "protocol problems" on my WiFi. WiFi is perfectly
> reliable for small, medium, and large office use when set up
> correctly.
>
> --
> -- Kevin Sonney
> -- kevin AT sonney.com
> -- ksonney AT gmail.com
> -- AIM: ksonney
> -- ICQ: 4855069
> -- GPG: 7BB612C9
> -- CACaert.org Assurer
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>


--
Robert Q Kim, Wireless Internet Advisor
http://evdo-coverage.com/cell-repeater.html
http://hsdpa-coverage.com

2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101
Suite 102
Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007
206 984 0880