internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] CryptOS
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:00:02 -0500
The JiGL Operating Environment (Jingle for short) offers all of this and
more. I believe it uses recursive random encryption and compression.
Thomas Beckett or David Minton can verify this feature, I think they've
used it a bit in the early trials.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Tanner Lovelace
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:01 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] CryptOS
>
> Alan MacHett wrote:
>
> > The closest I've come to finding what I have in mind is the project
of
> > this fellow in Dublin. He calls it CryptOS, but what he means is
> > CryptNetwork:
> > http://www.cs.tcd.ie/Christian.Jensen/research/CryptOS/
> > And there are also various (smart) card cryptographic operating
systems
> > and various cryptographic USB dongles.
> >
> > There's also this excellent article about making a secure OS:
> > http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20031125S0045
> >
> > ...but I'm not just thinking about a secure operating system or even
an
> > operating system that integrates strong cryptography --
> > http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html -- I want a cryptographic
operating
> > system. Ideally, even the hardware for the system would be built
with
> > crypto in mind. Then the OS itself would run encrypted. Only
> authorized
> > users could have access to the desktop. And if you forget your
password
> > ... oh well; none of this administrator level reverse-engineering
hashes
> > or whatnot to regain access -- you lose, start over. Undeniably
secure:
> > no way to hack it, crack it, reverse-engineer it, electron
spectroscope
> > it, or anything else that anyone might dream up...
> >
> > It's extreme and not economical, I know, much like my dream of
seeing
> Mech
> > Warriors duke it out on battlefields. Still, I suspect a CryptOS
would
> > have more use and popularity...
>
> Well, I don't think you'll have any luck right now with the hardware,
> but as far as the software goes, have you looked into SELinux? It
> was created by the NSA to be a secure version of linux. Linux
> Journal just ran an article recently about someone who put an
> installation of it on the net, gave out the root password, and
> people still failed to be able to crack it. It secures everything,
> even from root. Google should know where it is. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Tanner
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] CryptOS,
Alan MacHett, 12/22/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] CryptOS,
Tanner Lovelace, 12/23/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] CryptOS,
Shea Tisdale, 12/23/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] CryptOS, Shea Tisdale, 12/23/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] CryptOS, Thomas Beckett, 12/24/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] CryptOS, Alan MacHett, 12/23/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] CryptOS,
Shea Tisdale, 12/23/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] CryptOS,
Tanner Lovelace, 12/23/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.