internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "SJM" <smesser1 AT nc.rr.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:37:42 -0500
If they can do this for women, why can't they do it for men? It's only
fair.
stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Beckett" <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
To: "Internetworkers" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:12 PM
Subject: [internetworkers] orgasm machine
> For some reason, this was picked up by overseas news organizations and
> not on the U.S. news wires. But anyhow, it's right in our backyard.
>
>
<http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=3897324&
section=news>
>
-
[internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Thomas Beckett, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Joe Reid, 12/01/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine, Roger Austin, 12/01/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Shea Tisdale, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
David R . Matusiak, 12/02/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine, Kurt Schlatzer, 12/02/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
David R . Matusiak, 12/02/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
SJM, 12/02/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine, Sil Greene, 12/02/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine, Kurt Schlatzer, 12/03/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Beth, 12/01/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Colleen McCarthy, 12/01/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine, Jim Ray, 12/01/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Colleen McCarthy, 12/01/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] orgasm machine,
Joe Reid, 12/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.