internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Thomas C. Meggs" <tom AT plik.net>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Pine vs. procmailrc
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:38:33 -0500
Procmail is a beautiful thing, and is not email client dependant.
:0
* ^TOmetalab
/dev/null
Regards,
Tom
machett AT ibiblio.org wrote:
I could swear I configured pine to trash any mail I get to metalab.unc.edu
(no one I want mail from uses that address -- all I get is spam to it), but
I'm still getting spam. I didn't go with procmail because I figured that was
overkill, Pine being the quick and easy solution. I chose to eliminate mail
to the recipient machett AT metalab.unc.edu. Anyone think I overlooked
something, or should I just take the extra seconds to configure procmailrc??
-Alan
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] Pine vs. procmailrc,
machett, 01/16/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Pine vs. procmailrc, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/16/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.