internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: David Minton <dminton AT mindspring.com>
- To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question
- Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 12:56:13 -0400
Is this a trick question? If we do some fantasyland math:
470 CDs x 74 minutes = 34,780 minutes
If uncompressed, 773 sides or 387 cassettes.
If you got 10:1 compression from your MP3 encoding, that would need about 39
cassettes.
This assumes that all CDs are completely full (unlikely), and that song
breaks do not force leaving unused space on the ends of cassettes (also
unlikely).
Now that we have finished our time in fantasy land, why do you ask? Is there
such thing as a digital audio cassette recorder/player? How could you
transfer the data to an audio cassette, and be able to play it back, either
as music, or transfer it to another computer to decode the data as audio?
Just curious.
David
On 8/5/02 12:43 PM, "Gina Norman" <gina AT vnet.net> wrote:
> Ok, I started wondering how many cassettes it would take to store my
> current CD collection, assuming the CD collection were ripped to MP3 and
> saved to cassette via something like a Vic 20 (my very first computer). I
> know that storage capacity of a cassette would vary (based, I'm assuming
> on the length of the cassette?), but if we were to use a 45 min/side
> cassette (and whatever data "compression" mechanism was common for
> cassette drives), how much data could fit on one cassette?
>
> (If you wanted to go ahead and "do the math", I'm working with 470 CD's
> approx. Standard MP3 compression [128?].)
>
> Any ideas, anyone? (Other than the "known" that I think way too much)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gina
>
>
> ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> My brain seems to have a circuit-breaker-like mechanism that, when I get
> confused and befuddled by the overwhelming monstrosities of my life,
> causes a default to the simplest and most pleasant of thoughts. Like
> Marshmallow Peeps. I *like* Marshmallow Peeps.
>
> Gina Norman And the only bit that
> gina AT vnet.net (me personally) really matters:
> ginanorm AT nortelnetworks.com (me at work) http://users.vnet.net/gina
> ginathelintqueen AT yahoo.com (me personally, again -- sick of me yet? ;)
>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~;)~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~>
*
>
>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
David Minton, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Diana Duncan, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Tanner Lovelace, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
- RE: [internetworkers] Dumb question, Bill Geschwind, 08/05/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question, David Minton, 08/05/2002
- RE: [internetworkers] Dumb question, Bill Geschwind, 08/05/2002
- RE: [internetworkers] Dumb question, Gina Norman, 08/06/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question, Scott Russell, 08/06/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Tanner Lovelace, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Diana Duncan, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
Gina Norman, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Dumb question,
David Minton, 08/05/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.