internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Re: two madmen

From: Rachel Cox <rachel AT hesketh.com>
To: "InterNetWorkers" <internetworkers AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>, "InterNetWorkers" <internetworkers AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: two madmen
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:42:02 -0400

At 11:34 AM 5/2/2002 -0400, Jeri C. Gloege wrote:
[snip]
>When he responded (albeit with some sarcasm
>but can you blame him really)

Yes, absolutely. If someone doesn't respond without sarcasm to the question
of whether this is something we oughta be talking about here, I don't hold
out much hope for a rational discussion of something as fraught as the
situation in the Middle East.

Ciao -
Rachel
_____________________________________________________________________
Rachel Cox | Web Developer | 919.834.2552 x16 | hesketh.com/inc
Image is only the beginning. Knowledge is profitable.
http://www.hesketh.com/proof/white_papers/

two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: two madmen, K. Jo Garner, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Andrew Phillips, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Maria Winslow, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Paul Jones, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Andrew Phillips, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Jeri C. Gloege, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Kate Johnson, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, K. Jo Garner, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Rachel Cox, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Michael D. Thomas, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Diana Duncan, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, thomas, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Jeri C. Gloege, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Mark Andrews, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, thomas, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Childers . Paula, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Josep L. Guallar-Esteve, 05/02/2002