internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Jeri C. Gloege" <gloege AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: two madmen
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:34:50 -0400 (EDT)
Hmmm... I did not see Matusiak call you any names. But I might call you
one after that sarcastic little post.
The only one stirring the troublemaker pot here that I can see is you at
present (oh okay, and now me... but that is just what I do). Dave sent in
a perfectly valid link that could lead to a perfectly valid discussion. You
turned it into something else. When he responded (albeit with some sarcasm
but can you blame him really) you took it yet again to the next level. Look
in the mirror before you start snapping out at people about starting flames.
jeri
On 2 May 2002, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> Well I thought I gave you more credit then name-calling, guess the
> subject proves me wrong. If you're going to have a rational discussion,
> don't start with that.. fyi.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 11:21, David R. Matusiak wrote:
> > oh, excuse me for being off-topic. i forgot the focus here was
> > technology,
> > specifically as it applies to the internet. by the way, have you heard of
> > the
> > mozilla 1.0 release? big stuff.
> >
> > not that i have any grand visions of a rational discussion, but i do give
> > this
> > group more credit than an "instant flamewar" on any volatile topic.
> > thanks for
> > kicking me back in-line. hope to see you tonite.
> >
> > ___ _ _____ . ....
> > m a h t o o z e e a c k a t s p e e k e e z e e d o t n e t
> > ------ / / ......... . . .
> >
> > On 2 May 2002, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > I would suggest this group stays away from talking about the Middle
> > > east, people have very strong feelings about this issue and an "Internet
> > > Workers" mailing list is not really the place to start flames about
> > > this.
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > > ------------------------
> > > Andrew Phillips
> > > Applications Developer
> > > aphillips AT buildscape.com
> > > (919) 484-9843 x 246
> > > http://www.buildscape.com
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 10:56, David R. Matusiak wrote:
> > >
> > > > perhaps there is a western media bias, but these two look like
> > > > loons...
> > > >
> > > > remote: http://www.msnbc.com/news/677951.asp?pne=msn
> > > >
> > > > local: http://slate.msn.com/?id=2065191
> > > >
> > > > abandoning all hope for a mideast solution,
> > > > dave m.
> > > > ___ _ _____ . ....
> > > > m a h t o o z e e a c k a t s p e e k e e z e e d o t n e t
> > > > ------ / / ......... . . .
>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: gloege AT ibiblio.org
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
--
Jeri Gloege
jeri AT fractalmind.org
http://www.fractalmind.org
Creating and part of the problem since 1974...
-
two madmen,
David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: two madmen, K. Jo Garner, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Andrew Phillips, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Maria Winslow, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Paul Jones, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Andrew Phillips, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Jeri C. Gloege, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Kate Johnson, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, K. Jo Garner, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Rachel Cox, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, David R. Matusiak, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Michael D. Thomas, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Diana Duncan, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, thomas, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Jeri C. Gloege, 05/02/2002
- Re: two madmen, Mark Andrews, 05/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.