Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: Personalization -- opinions?

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: mdthomas AT mindspring.com
  • To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Personalization -- opinions?
  • Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:30:44 -0500




>But beyond that knee-jerk reaction to BV,
>I'd be curious as to how the "someone"
>envisions "personalization" fitting into
>their site - what is the scope of their
>requirements, in other words? And why would
>you consider paying money for generalized
>bloatware in the first place?

Per Personalization: the idea is simple. "Match
content to the web user." The problem is complex.
"Users" must exist as unique entities, and they
must be represented as composites of various
pre-defined data points. "Content" must be similarly
atomic and all the individual entities of "content"
must be sortable on a best-fit/worst-fit axis
for each possible "User." Both "Users" and
"Content" sets must be overridingly complete to
be effective. Oh, and then your matrix must
be represented in a realworld presentation
layer, and the whole experience must be pleasing
enough so that the "Users" come back and gain value
from having the site personalized in the first
place.

Per buying bloatware:

If people didn't buy bloatware, what would
happen to the bloatware training & consulting
market? That's a major part of the GDP! You
want us to have a high GDP, right??

--
tired of being an underappreciated functionary in a soulless machine?
hesketh.com is hiring: http://www.hesketh.com/careers/

---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: mdthomas AT mindspring.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page