Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] BBC -glbl wrmg-propaganda investigation

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: DSanner106 AT aol.com
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] BBC -glbl wrmg-propaganda investigation
  • Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:23:39 EDT

Because they believe in only presenting factual information in the schools,
and when
asked to support a wide array of claims made in the film, Gore and his group
were unable to do so. They never responded to the request. I am sure that
had they
done so, and were able to show that the film was factual, it would have been
allowed. Of course the industries in England that were against the films
presentation
opposed it and forced a challenge, but if one is unwilling to support ones
own claims
then I have to agree that you should not take them seriously.


In a message dated 9/28/2008 1:23:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
liberty AT kaballero.com writes:

With the stakes being so utterly high, you are right. Why would someone
like "Lord Monckton [play] ... a key role in a legal challenge heard in
the High Court in October 2007 in an effort to prevent Al Gore’s film on
global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, from being shown in English
schools?" I wondered the same thing.





**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial
challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips
and
calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page