Homestead mailing list

[bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>]

James; There sails are still full of air.  Right after the announcement, the 
Brady campaign claimed partial victory -- go figure?

As to your second point: Don't count on the ACLU,They will defend the 
Constitution , vigorously, when it suits the cultural purpose of that group.  
Their assertion is that they have never taken a pro or con stance on the 2nd 
Ammendment--now, as you say, they need to stand up--but they will not.  They 
will be too busy defending the G** da*n*d Man Boy Love Association......'very 
hard not to use swear words in front of the name of that 
group---sorry...bobford


--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Clansgian AT wmconnect.com <Clansgian AT wmconnect.com> wrote:

> From: Clansgian AT wmconnect.com <Clansgian AT wmconnect.com>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] SCOTUS strikes gun ban
> To: bobford79 AT yahoo.com
> Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 2:56 PM
> Well, meanwhile, back at the 2nd amendment:
> 
> 1)  DC has one of the highest if not the highest gun crime
> rate in the US.  
> Unless it is in some nexxus of an alternate  galaxy and in
> fact operates like 
> the rest of the known universe, that crime rate will go
> down drastically.  The 
> left-wingers have already begun wringing their hands and
> saying that with all 
> the handguns already there, allowing more will make even
> MORE crime.  What 
> idiots.  This 'experiment' should take the last of
> the wind out of the gun 
> grabber's sails.
> 
> 2) The ACLU has always said it does not defend the 2nd
> amendment because it 
> is a state right and not an individual right.  OK, now we
> know it's not.  It is 
> now and forever an individual right.  The ACLU is
> completely without any 
> footing at all unless it includes the 2nd amendment along
> with all other civil 
> rights.   </HTML>