Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] How NOT to judge

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>
  • To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] How NOT to judge
  • Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 08:05:57 -0800

The DOD doesn't track income of recruits or their parents, so there is no way to say one way or another what the income levels are. The folks who like to do stats have done that in a way that has absolutely no correlation to reality. They use the Zip Code of the recruit. Well, that tells us squat about the individual.

Plus, the *vast* majority of the U.S. population is white. Saying the *vast* majority of the military is white means nothing. You have to look at ratio to population. If you do that, then you come up with more of certain minorities in relationship to the overall population. Using the more realistic ratio formula, blacks are over-represented at a 1.32 ratio and whites are under represented at .97.

However, the ethnic group who has the largest % in the military are American Indians!

Of course, one can have all kinds of fun with numbers. Hawaii has the largest % of their population between the ages of 16-64 in the military (5%), California has the largest number in the military, there's a slightly higher than 1:10 ratio of black to white veterans, 13% of the population are veterans, 6% of the veterans are women and 37% of the veterans are over 64.

Lynda
----- Original Message ----- From: <DSanner106 AT aol.com>


This is a major falsehood. The vast majority of soldiers in the military
today are white, middle class
young men. Education levels have never been higher. I know at least 10 young
men and women who have joined in the past 4 years, my nephew enters the navy
in 29 days, and a young man we had temporary custody of (named TJ by
chance) and helped raise goes into the army on July 29. They both made well thought
out decisions and do feel like they are serving their country and taking a
path that is right for them.

This bit about the south having the lowest per capita income is just a bad
use of statistics. If you
don't incorporate cost of living and standard of living you are comparing
apples to kumquats. I read yesterday
that 2 percent of teachers and 4 percent of nurses in northern california,
specifically around San Francisco can afford to own a home rather than rent. In
the south, the numbers are very close to 100 percent. This tells me a lot
more than just basic per capita income all by itself. If you were to ask me
where the people are poorer, I would point out many areas before the south.

Drew


In a message dated 5/2/2008 2:13:23 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
lurine AT softcom.net writes:

Enlistment percentages may be mostly an indication of family
financial status, boys and girls who find no better choice.

I don't think of
military enlistment today as an expression of patriotism or as
indicating feelings toward military enterprises or wars in general.


I
believe that the lowest per capita incomes are in the South.





**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/lurine%40softcom.net
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page