Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] D.C. Whorehouse ethics decline further

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
  • To: "homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [Homestead] D.C. Whorehouse ethics decline further
  • Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:08:06 -0700

Yeah, I know, putting Congress and ethics in the same sentence is an oxymoron. These people are beyond arrogant; they are the epitome of the axiom that power corrupts. We need a system to oversee the system.
The only one I know is to always vote against the incumbent. An extremely high majority of congresspeople are reelected; to be elected the first time is to almost ensure a career of working the system, then either retiring on far more than most Americans or walking across the street to begin work as a lobbyist for the companies once watched. In the meantime, they give themselves pay raises and benefits, get a fine health care plan, and maneuver for ever more power. Party line votes do not reflect representation of the folks who elected them. The reflection that saddens me most is that obvious scoundrels are reelected. That reflects badly on the intelligence or the values of voters.

Ethics in the House

Published: January 5, 2005

Congressional Republicans are actually trying to claim the side of the angels in their forced retreat from defending the ethical lapses of the majority leader Tom DeLay. "I feel like we have just taken a shower," one G.O.P. lawmaker said. Not hardly. While taking a half-step from Mr. DeLay's more embarrassing machinations, the Republican majority made sure to strike a potentially lethal blow to the enfeebled House ethics process.
A rules change engineered by the leadership means that corruption complaints against lawmakers will automatically expire if the evenly divided ethics committee finds itself in a 5-to-5 party-line standoff. As hobbled as the old system was, a standoff at least meant that the complaint went to a subcommittee for investigation. That produced three warnings for Mr. DeLay last year.
Speaker Dennis Hastert is also reported to be intent on purging the current chairman, Joel Hefley, a Colorado Republican who shocked his party by suddenly taking the job seriously. Mr. Hefley dared to sign off on the three admonishments of Mr. DeLay for cutting ethical corners by buttering up lobbyists, arm-twisting for floor votes and siccing federal agents on the Democrats who fled his gerrymandering intrusion into the Texas Statehouse. Hardly a career firebrand, Mr. Hefley, if he is to go, should be replaced by someone truly dedicated to rebuilding the House's tattered ethical reputation.
An unbowed Mr. DeLay was able to rally the G.O.P. troops in November for a shameless rules change that would have meant he wouldn't have to step aside as leader should he be indicted in a Texas grand jury inquiry into his fund-raising activities. But even Mr. DeLay had to endorse the scrapping of this shield as he faced growing resistance this week from Republicans concerned that his ethical arrogance had become a defining issue for the Democrats.
Still, the Republicans' belated realization that they needed to put limits on Mr. DeLay's demands for ethical sanctuary would have seemed more sincere if they'd done without the sleight of hand that makes a greater mockery of the ethics process.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/05/opinion/05wed2.html



  • [Homestead] D.C. Whorehouse ethics decline further, Gene GeRue, 01/05/2005

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page