homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
- From: "Toni Hawryluk" <tonihawr AT msn.com>
- To: "Homestead mailing list" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [Homestead] "jus"t stupid ? or ...
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 21:00:37 -0800
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6694659/<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6694659/>
Military hardware wearing faster than expected
Insurgent attacks, desert conditions take toll
By Jim Miklaszewski Correspondent NBC News
Updated: 7:21 p.m. ET Dec. 10, 2004
Before the war in Iraq, Pentagon officials had predicted that by now, Iraq
would be pacified and most American troops would be long gone. But as the war
drags on, the toll it's taking is far greater than expected - not only on the
soldiers, but their equipment as well.
In fact, senior military officials now tell NBC News all major military
equipment - trucks, tanks, helicopters and even guns - is breaking down or
wearing out at a faster rate than first estimated.
It's not only due to the harsh desert conditions in Iraq, but the enemy has
proven far more effective and resilient than anyone in the Pentagon had
imagined. That's putting a far greater load on such equipment as Humvees and
tanks - which are working at ten-times the normal rate.
"We're running the tracks off them," says NBC military analyst Gen. Barry
McCaffrey (ret.) "They're going, instead of 800 miles a year, 8,000 miles a
year
and we're not rebuilding it."
It's also putting a tremendous stress on the military's ability to fix them.
The number of tanks requiring major repairs is up 600 percent. Before the
war, some 300 Humvees a year would go through a major overhaul. Today that
number has skyrocketed to 5,700 - a jump of nearly 2,000 percent.
"Our folks are in a constant cycle of repair, repair, repair to return this
equipment to the force," says Gary Motsek, with the U.S. Army Support
Operations.
And the cost is staggering. Last year the Army got an additional $1 billion
to pay for wartime repairs. This year the price tag is expected to climb to
$9 billion.
Even then, it's an increase in military spending that will extend well beyond
the war.
"Should the war end today, it would take two years for the United States Army
to replenish itself and bring its equipment back to proper state," says Rep.
Ike Skelton, D-Mo., and a member of the House Armed Services Committee.
But in fact, the war appears nowhere near ending. Friday, Military officials
said current plans call for the same number of American troops to remain in
Iraq for at least the
next two years.
© 2004 MSNBC Interactive
- [Homestead] "jus"t stupid ? or ..., Toni Hawryluk, 12/11/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.