Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] Bill - was (is?) Global....

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "clanSkeen" <sgian AT planetc.com>
  • To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [Homestead] Bill - was (is?) Global....
  • Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:38:56 -0500

Bill, took you, what?, six posts to get that out?

The reason why your post was moronic is an objective one: instead of addressing any one of the ideas in the post, you ignored them all and made a direct 'ad hominem' attack. If you had addressed any of the issues being discussed in the thread: health, overweight, socialism, drug use, ... any of them, then it would have been just another post with which some would agree and some would disagree and most would not give it a passing thought. Instead of that you resort to sort of slack-jawed drooling blather as the antagonist in Cyrano de Bergerac when invited to comment on Cyrano all he could come up with is "Sir, you have a large nose."

So to recap, in case you got lost in all that, if you are have anything to add to, challange, contrdict, refine, etc. what I posted, it's just another post. When all you have to say is "James, you are a bad person" ... that's moronic.

As to:
As I recall you called every other person

This list, a good many years ago now, used to be nearly half posts about something directly focussing on homesteading. There were still the political and religious jibes, most of it good natured, and most of it in the end found its way back to some homestead related topic. Then the list became dominated by a curious few people who were struggling with various non-homesteading-related problems in their lives: personal, health, mental, and most of them self-induced at that. The threads became dominated not by homesteading per se, but rather by 'being overweight and on drugs and homesteading', 'having serious financial problems [repeatedly] and homesteading', 'making horrible personal choices and homesteading', and 'having a broken marriage and family and homesteading.' It isn't that those things don't enter into SOME people's homesteading experience, it's that it became the list PC that if you posted anything that did not contain some deference to the bad choices the whiners had made it was 'telling them what to do.' If you dared post any observation about your own homestead or homesteading in general that contained any reference to being in GOOD health, or making GOOD choices, or being finacially stable, or was a function of a good marriage and sound family, it was decried as "childish howlings" and worst. Homestead discussions ground to a halt because no one dared post anything that did not include taking drugs, going through a divorce, bankrupting their farm, having half a dozen rare diseases, or being half again over over a healthy weight.

Then the whiners decided to migrate. Most ended up on the "Robinson's Loosers"
list where the practice is to mix in every sort of bad malady and bad decision with equal parts of homesteading and view that as the norm. It's a very entertaining list, there's enough material there for a great book or at least a series of essays on how to lose the farm.

But the thing is, those whiners are gone. Or at least they don't post any more. And I and those like me are still here. And although the list is a bit involved in politics and partisanism, in main it has been conducted with civility (except, of course, your post, Bill). In the past I was irritated by the amount of political crap that went one but I've had to change my mind about that. The thing is, whereas any actual homestead discussions were quelled when the list was dominated by a culture of whining, now that it is dominated by a culture of politics, there are some very good homestead thread going on. Some very good topics have spun off of the political and even the religious threads. None ever came from the 'I'm a fat prescription drug adict' threads.

But another interesting bit remains hanging: why did a reference to the expectations under socialism of overweight people taking too many drugs send a round down your smokesack? Why did it push your buttons so cleanly that you came out of left field with personal comments stemming from a discussion of socialism? Hit a little too close to home, did it?

It's true I've posted some outlandish opinions on this list (most everyone has). Yet I've never had anyone get their hackles up over an opinion, not even once. What gets their hackles up is when the truth lands a little too close to home. That's the thing about truth, it isn't very popular.

It's all been instructive. When we were planning on building a house, we explored the idea of building a log house. Even cut and hauled the logs. Then, as in every other aspect of homesteading, we found out as much as we could before we committed any more time and resources. We visited every log house to which we could wrangle and invitation (and some we couldn't!). We had heard tht they were not what they were cracked up to be unless you literally built a whole studded and insulated house within the house. The log house builders fell into three types: 1) Those who had a bad experience and there was nothing good to be said about the $&$^#^% log houses. 2) Those who would not entertain, nor allow you to entertain, that there was one thing, one tiny thing, wrong with a log house. After all they had spent many tens of thousands of dollars on their house and they were not going to allow that they might have made a mistake. The epitome of this was the log home owner who became very defensive and testy at the notion that log houses built with the type of construction as his tended to be cold ... he derided the notion to some length pulling the two sweaters closer and putting another log on the fire. 3) The third type was the only useful type. To our inquiries they's sigh an bit then say "Well, I can tell you the advantages of a log house but first you better let me show you some things here, it's not all good news." The success we've had at homesteading is because of this last type of paradigm. In any project or task we evaluate it with the bias that we've done something wrong somewhere. What did we DO that was not right, what did we think or believe that did not stand the test? This has afforded a slow (and sometimes painfiul) but steady improvement.

Whiners are more like our man with the two sweaters, long johns, sweat shirt and parka throwing logs on the fire and vehemently denying that his house was cold. Everything is either unavoidable circumstances or else it is someone else's fault ... and at any rate, how dare you bring thermometer with you or notice that your breath is condensing in my living room!

The lesson here is that discussions toward exploration and improvement do not mix with discusssions based on whining. They are for two different purposes. I really think that the homestead portion of this list has once again turned toward exploration. And that, Bill, is what I mean by 'we'.

James






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page