Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

gmark - Re: [GMark] Re: Not everybody missed it.

gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Kata Markon

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "John Oliff" <JOLIFF AT pbu.edu>
  • To: Kata Markon <gmark AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [GMark] Re: Not everybody missed it.
  • Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:05:57 -0400

Michael

You may wish to view my thesis entitled "Jesus, The Messenger and Voice of
the Way:
The Narrator's use of Scripture in Mark 1:1-3. I argued this exact point.

See also Juel's commentary on Mark; also Tolbert on "Sowing"

John

On 15 Oct 2004 at 0:02, RickR370 AT aol.com wrote:

> Jeffrey,
> your statment misses my point:
>
> What I am saying is that if Kaqws is translated correctly What stands
> written
> in Isaiah is the euaggleiou. That being the case how could scholars not see
> that the next line was not a quotaton but direct address on the part of the
> writer to his the reader. It cannot be a quotation if what is written in
> Isaiah
> refers to the good news. Tell the list who among scholars has recognized
> this.
> I have never heard anyone at Princeton or anywhere else translate the text
> this way? If you have anyone who sees the line that starts with Idou
> presented
> as direct address please post the reference. There is no commentator that I
> know of that translates the text this way.
>
>
> Michael
>
> The reading the prophets has been noted as a correction by scribes
> attempting
> to explain the misquote. I think this is a more likely explanationn for the
> later reading. The point is, what follows is not a OT quotation at all but
> direct address from writer to reader.
>
> Rick Richmond
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page