Kata Markon

[Steve Black <sblack AT axionet.com>]

Sid,

I like your general idea. I think I might tweak it a bit.

I think that perhaps the second half may start after the 
transfiguration scene (9:1-8). The transfiguration seems to be the 
climax we really desire at the end of the gospel, but are denied 
(which is why some think it may be a misplaced resurrection 
appearance). So I would place it at (close to?) the apex of the story 
line.

I'm also not sure "rise and fall" really captures the intent.  I 
don't have an alternative to offer. I think the whole story (both 
halves) are included by Mark as "GOOD News" (Mk 1:1), which somehow 
doesn't jive with the idea of fall (as in raise & fall). When I think 
of "rise and fall", I think of what that means, for example, when 
applied to the Third Reich - utter collapse and demise - which I 
don't think is exactly Mark's idea. There is, however, a demise and 
descent for Mark's Christ - so maybe I'm just quibbling over words...
--
Peace

Steve Black
Vancouver, BC