freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props
- From: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 AT gmail.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:21:39 +0000
2014/1/2 Stephen Marshall <smarshall AT kayak.com>:
> FreeTDS 0.91 does not honor the CS_SERVERADDR tag in the ct_con_props
> function. This function and tag are used to allow database connections
> using a "<host> <port>" syntax.
>
Which "tag" ?
> There is code in FreeTDS that compensates for this problem by allowing the
> user to specify the server name as "<host>:<port>". FreeTDS supports this
> syntax as a fallback case when a server name cannot be found in the
> configuration file. See freetds file src/tds/config.c,
> parse_server_name_for_port function for details. However, this is not a
> standard part of the TDS protocol. Client applications conforming to the
> standard can end up doing the wrong thing. I have noticed this problem in
> the sqsh client, but may affect other clients as well.
>
> The connection code should either be fixed or the CS_SERVERADDR macro
> should be disabled. The latter would signal to client applications that
> CS_SERVERADDR does not work per spec, which would allow client applications
> to avoid calling this function when linked against FreeTDS.
>
> Note: this problem was originally submitted as a bug to the sqsh project,
> but latter determined to be a problem in FreeTDS. Further details of the
> original submission can be found here:
> http://sourceforge.net/p/sqsh/bugs/60/
>
> Also note that I tried to fix this myself, but I got a little lost in
> mapping of connection information between several different data
> structures. It does not seem like the port information is carried through
> all of them. With some guidance on how to proceed without inducing side
> effects, I would be happy to work on this problem.
I do not follow at all.
Frediano
-
[freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Stephen Marshall, 01/02/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Frediano Ziglio, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Marc Abramowitz, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Kayak, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Stephen Marshall, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Frediano Ziglio, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Stephen Marshall, 01/06/2014
- Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props, Frediano Ziglio, 01/09/2014
- Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props, Stephen Marshall, 01/09/2014
- Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props, James K. Lowden, 01/10/2014
- Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props, Stephen Marshall, 01/13/2014
- Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props, James K. Lowden, 01/14/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Stephen Marshall, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Frediano Ziglio, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Stephen Marshall, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Kayak, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Marc Abramowitz, 01/06/2014
-
Re: [freetds] CS_SERVERADDR tag is not handled correctly in ct_con_props,
Frediano Ziglio, 01/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.