freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Cedric ROUVRAIS <cedric.rouvrais AT sgcib.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC]
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:57:21 -0400
Hi Alex,
No problems, I probably wasn't very clear. I have seen the report
Microsoft, however it isn't related to the issue at hand. DB Artisan is
working just fine and reporting the correct count of rows impacted.
For me there is no doubt in my mind that it is an issue with the dbcount
procedure.
a++ Cedric
|------------------------------
| "Mittel,
| Alexander"
| <Alexander.Mittel
| @siemens.com>
| Sent by:
| freetds-bounces@l
| ists.ibiblio.org
|
|
| 08/18/2009 07:52
| AM
|
|
| Please respond to
| FreeTDS
| Development Group
| <freetds AT lists.ib
| iblio.org>
|
|
To
FreeTDS Development Group
<freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
cc
Subject
Re: [freetds] rowcount not
available? [NC]
Hi Cedric,
"Asche über mein Haupt" -
I should have been quit if I don't know what DBCOUNT(dbproc) is.
MS says, that something changes with SET ROWCOUNT, but for SQL Server 2005
MS said the same.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188774.aspx
http://jmkehayias.blogspot.com/2008/12/set-rowcount-functionality-changes.html
Maybe now they really changed something in SQL Server 2008.
Unfortunately I have no v2008 to test.
Mfg Alexander
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] Im Auftrag von Cedric ROUVRAIS
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. August 2009 16:25
An: FreeTDS Development Group
Betreff: Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC]
Hi Alex,
I am reporting a bug in the dblib.c because the function dbcount(DBPROCESS
* dbproc) returns -1 instead of returning the number of rows affected. So
this is not a MS Sql issue but a problem in FreeTDS/dblib
The problem can be seen at the bsqldb.c function with this code:
/*
* Get row count, if available.
*/
if (!options.fquiet) {
if (DBCOUNT(dbproc) > -1) {
fprintf(options.output, "(%d rows affected)\n",
DBCOUNT(dbproc));
}
// Removed the following code in order to replicate
SYBASE ISQL behaviour.
//else fprintf(stderr, "@@rowcount not available\n");
}
I commented out the fprintf in my code to replicate the behaviour of ISQL
from Sybase, however the statement is incorrect in the sense that the value
of @@rowcount is available and set correctly (I checked this by doing
select @@ROWCOUNT in bsqldb and it correctly returned 10).
Hopes this clarifies,
Cedric
|------------------------------
| "Mittel,
| Alexander"
| <Alexander.Mittel
| @siemens.com>
Hi,
this is a FreeTDS-mailing list, not a SQLServer-forum :-)
But: "set rowcount nn" is something completly different then "@@ROWCOUNT".
"set rowcount 10" limits the number of returned rows when doing a SELECT.
If a table has 20 rows then only 10 rows will be returned.
"@@ROWCOUNT" is set by SQLServer and contains the number of affected rows,
i.e. with UPDATE
Maybe look at MS doc to see
Mfg Alexander
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] Im Auftrag von Cedric ROUVRAIS
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. August 2009 21:33
An: FreeTDS Development Group
Betreff: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC]
Hi,
Me again, anybody have any clues? When I execute select @@ROWCOUNT I get
the correct count that is to say. Why would the rowcount not be available ?
a++ Cedric
__________________
Hi guys,
I have come across an interesting behaviour with SQL Server 2008, when you
use the instruction: "set rowcount nn" such as "set rowcount 10" then
DBCOUNT(dbproc) returns -1.
Anyone have any ideas???
Thanks,
Cedric
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
*************************************************************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential, intended
solely for the addressee(s), and may contain legally privileged information.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible
to alteration. Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or
affiliates shall be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
*************************************************************************
-
[freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/13/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Mittel, Alexander, 08/14/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/14/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Mittel, Alexander, 08/18/2009
- Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC], Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/18/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Mittel, Alexander, 08/18/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/14/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
James K. Lowden, 08/20/2009
- Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC], Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/20/2009
-
[freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/20/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Thompson, Bill D (London), 08/21/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/21/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
James K. Lowden, 08/23/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/23/2009
- Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC], James K. Lowden, 08/24/2009
- Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC], Konrad J Hambrick, 08/24/2009
- Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC], Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/24/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/23/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
James K. Lowden, 08/23/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Cedric ROUVRAIS, 08/21/2009
-
Re: [freetds] BCP In of data too large fails [NC],
Thompson, Bill D (London), 08/21/2009
-
Re: [freetds] rowcount not available? [NC],
Mittel, Alexander, 08/14/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.