FreeTDS Development Group

[christos AT zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)]

On Feb 9,  5:23pm, freddy77 AT gmail.com (Frediano Ziglio) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: [freetds] Getting it to all work on HPUX

| > So, does this work?
| >
| > #if defined(__hpux) && !defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED)
| >        int socklen;
| > #else
| >        socklen_t socklen;
| > #endif
| >
| > Sorry,^WThankfully I don't have HP/UX so I can't test. Having the same
| > symbol in two different libraries with different ABI is not the best
| > solution. Why aren't they using symbol renaming?
| >
| > christos
| 
| obviously it depends on linker options :(
| However a __getsockopt seems defined in xnet and use always socklen_t
| 

Then we can test for that... and HAVE___GETSOCKOPT...

christos