freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] TDsPool
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:26:36 +0200
>
> Federico Alves wrote:
> > Any chance we could update tdspool?
>
> I myself have no intention on working on tdspool. Patches
> are of course
> welcome!
>
I can confirm, personally I have very few time to improve it.
However to solve the problem personally I would work on odbc pooling.
The reasons are
- you are using odbc
- it's easier to implement cause
- you have just to reset connection, put in the pool and retrieve on a
new connection
- you have the clear password to check (tdspool require network parsing
which is difficult using ntlm or kerberos)
- it's faster (you don't need an extra process which add latency)
The only problem I see is that odbc pooling work on a single process,
but with current multi-thread applications it's not a big problem. It
could be fixed duplicating file descriptors across processed but I don't
know a way to do it under *nix.
freddy77
-
[freetds] TDsPool,
Federico Alves, 06/05/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
James K. Lowden, 06/05/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 06/10/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
James K. Lowden, 06/10/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 06/11/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
James K. Lowden, 06/11/2008
- [freetds] passing a file descriptor over a pipe (was: TDsPool), James K. Lowden, 06/18/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
James K. Lowden, 06/11/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 06/11/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
James K. Lowden, 06/10/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 06/10/2008
- Re: [freetds] TDsPool, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 06/12/2008
-
Re: [freetds] TDsPool,
James K. Lowden, 06/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.