freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT freetds.org>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] FreeTDS Digest, Vol 64, Issue 12
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 14:05:29 -0400
Federico Alves wrote:
> Microsoft determined that the problem that brought SQL Server down was
> "set implicit_transactions on" What causes the change in behavior?
> Microsoft thinks that this should be off, otherwise every transaction
> must be committed explicitly in code.
I am sorry for your loss. That sounds like absolutely no fun.
If you look at a TDSDUMP log, you will find that at no point does tsql
(or, of its own accord, any part of FreeTDS) send "SET
IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS ON" to the server. If IMPLICIT_TRANSACTIONS is ON
when you connect with tsql, it's because it's a server setting, probably a
database default. Full stop.
Questions for Microsoft:
1. Why didn't you point to the database settings?
2. Why do repeated rollbacks lead to a server crash?
3. Isn't a server crash ipso facto a bug?
HTH.
--jkl
-
Re: [freetds] FreeTDS Digest, Vol 64, Issue 12,
Federico Alves, 05/10/2008
- Re: [freetds] FreeTDS Digest, Vol 64, Issue 12, James K. Lowden, 05/10/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.