freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
[freetds] Question about alpha vs RC vs stable releases
- From: "Medi Montaseri" <medi AT resonate.com>
- To: <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [freetds] Question about alpha vs RC vs stable releases
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:33:57 -0700
Hi,
Just joining this forum....I would like to download the latest
production quality stable release. I intend to use this on a linux
x86_64 machine.
>From http://www.freetds.org/software.html one can proceed to stable
releases at http://ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/ALPHA/freetds/stable/ where
the README would says:
$Id: README,v 1.10.4.1 2006/07/01 15:09:33 jklowden Exp $
README for FreeTDS 0.64
Saturday 1 July 2006
So looks like 0.64 is the one I should be getting. However
http://ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/ALPHA/freetds/stable/freetds-0.64.tar.gz is
clearly in some ALPHA directory. Should I just "never mind" the path and
trust that 0.64 is stable or what ?
Then I come accross a file called
http://ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/ALPHA/freetds/stable/README.index that
reads
The numbering system is rational but potentially confusing.
The current stable release is 0.63. It is quite new.
Enjoy.
--jkl
Hence this email....which is it; 0.63 or 0.64
Thanks
Medi
-
[freetds] Question about alpha vs RC vs stable releases,
Medi Montaseri, 03/30/2007
- Re: [freetds] Question about alpha vs RC vs stable releases, James K. Lowden, 03/31/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.