freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Patrick Dunnigan <patrick.dunnigan AT centivia.com>
- To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [freetds] ctlib vs. dblib vs. tds
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:57:04 -0500
Hi All,
I've been using DBD:Sybase -> freeTDS -> MSSQL 2000 for three years now. I've
been porting some of the code to C recently and am basically cutting the Perl
piece out.
My questions are: what are the major differences between ctlib, dblib, and
using the code under src/tds?
My guess is that the ctlib and dblib use the tds libs, but haven't seen much
mention of this.
I've tried out both the ctlib and tds piece on it's own, and am considering
trying out the dblib.
Why would I pick one over the other?
Lastly, which is most likely to support 2005 use?
I'd like to use placeholders and bulkcopies and text fields. I didn't have
much success with the Bulk Copies for TEXT or placeholders in ctlib. I didn't
see any references to bulk in the TDS code but the placeholders worked ok (as
long as it's not a text field insert). That's why I'm now considering trying
out dblib, but I have concern that this lib won't be supported in the future.
Thanks,
Patrick
-
[freetds] ctlib vs. dblib vs. tds,
Patrick Dunnigan, 03/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] ctlib vs. dblib vs. tds, James K. Lowden, 03/26/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [freetds] ctlib vs. dblib vs. tds, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 03/25/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.