freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Daly, Fergal" <fergal.daly AT accpac.com>
- To: 'FreeTDS Development Group' <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] status of SQL_ATTR_ROW_BIND_TYPE?
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 06:24:11 -0700
> From: Frediano Ziglio [mailto:freddyz77 AT tin.it]
>
> I don't remember exactly the patch... perhaps you are speaking about
> patch to remove warning... It's not so difficult to implement that
> change however it's not so easy at it seems. For this reason we
> implement it not allowing more than one row at a time. Your
> application
> have to support this case (or your application it's not
> ODBC-compliant... refer to specifications if you don't believe it...)
I believe you :) The problem is that we require it for our application. The
data access patterns are such that reading a row at a time is just too slow,
we need a client-side static cursor. Of course if you can suggest a way of
achieving that without row-wise binding I'd be very happy but altering the
way the application uses data is not an option for me.
I'll give your cvs snapshot a go, in the next few days, thanks,
F
-
[freetds] status of SQL_ATTR_ROW_BIND_TYPE?,
Daly, Fergal, 07/16/2004
- Re: [freetds] status of SQL_ATTR_ROW_BIND_TYPE?, Frediano Ziglio, 07/16/2004
- Re: [freetds] status of SQL_ATTR_ROW_BIND_TYPE?, Frediano Ziglio, 07/19/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [freetds] status of SQL_ATTR_ROW_BIND_TYPE?, Daly, Fergal, 07/21/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.