freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend())
- From: liam AT inodes.org
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend())
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 16:47:19 +1000
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:50:58AM +0200, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Unless there are some objections (or offers) I'll start trying to patch
> > the apparent numerous memory leaks in 0.62.4.
> >
>
> This patch should fix the problem (committed in 0.63, not in 0.62)
Thanks. I also sent a similar patch to James before you sent yours.
Unfortunately, there is still a more subtle memory leak that I've
been trying to track down.
The test code leaks approximately 96-120 bytes per 1,000 interations. I
would expect that the leak variance between execution is due to page
fragementation but I'll take other suggestions. However, it is still
very puzzling as I would expect a consistent leak for every iteration
not one page per 40 interations. Maybe a bad realloc() somewhere?
I've re-compiled FreeTDS with dmalloc, removed -O2 and added -g.
The dmalloc report has libc functions like nss_* and dlopen_* on the
not freed list which is probably okay. I did however see that
strdup() and tsearch() were also on the list which is suspicious.
I think dbcancel() needs to be modified to clear out the RPC
structure and any paramaters so it can be called after use but I
don't know if this is an appropriate course of action interms of
other vendor impementations of dblib.
I need to get rid of this memory leak, any other suggestions on what
else it might be?
Cheers.
-
re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
liam, 07/07/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
liam, 07/07/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
James K. Lowden, 07/07/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2004
- Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()), James K. Lowden, 07/08/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2004
- Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()), liam, 07/09/2004
- Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()), liam, 07/15/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
James K. Lowden, 07/07/2004
-
Re: re-use of dbprocess structure (was: Re: [freetds] state of dbrpcsend()),
liam, 07/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.