Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction"

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Frediano Ziglio <freddyz77 AT tin.it>
  • To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction"
  • Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:59:03 -0000

Il dom, 2004-01-11 alle 01:25, Castellano, Nicholas ha scritto:
> > From: James K. Lowden [mailto:jklowden AT schemamania.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:16 AM
> > To: FreeTDS Development Group
> > Subject: Re: [freetds] ODBC unit tests "funccall" and "transaction"
> >
> > My last information was that your test boxes run
> > unixODBC-2.2.6, and Freddy tells us unixODBC-2.2.7 is just
> > broken, and not only for FreeTDS.
> > Is that accurate?
>
> Yes, the 0.62 release notes should definitely say to use 2.2.6 and avoid
> 2.2.7. I still have 2.0.11 on the Digital UNIX system, so that machine
> doesn't pass the "transaction" test, but I'm confident that it would if I
> upgraded to 2.2.6 (which I'm currently not at liberty to do).
>

Yesterday Nick Gorham replied to my mail and confirm the problem. 2.2.7
is quite broken... Nick is working to fix the problem and release a
2.2.8 version ASAP. It give to me a patch (already in unixODBC CVS) but
it do not fix all problems. I tried also to update our
SQLExecute/SQLExecDirect to return correct SQL_NO_DATA value (this
should be correct result is no data) however more tests fails :( so I
leave the code as is (even if do not respect specification in this
direction)...

freddy77






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page