Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc4

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [freetds] Status: 0.62rc4
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:44:13 +0100

>
> ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/ALPHA/freetds/current/freetds-
> release-candid
> ate.tgz
>
> The above symlink points to freetds-0.62rc4.tar.gz, a copy of
> last night's snapshot. This candidate incorporates Nick's
> 64-bit fixes from yesterday.
>
> My 64-bit NetBSD/Alpha machine passed all unit tests for this
> release, with no warnings from the old GCC compiler. We have
> positive feedback on Tru64, AIX, HP/UX, Mac OS X, FreeBSD,
> NetBSD, and of course Linux. Did I leave anyone out?
>

Did you check ODBC too ? iODBC, unixODBC ??
64-bit ODBC seems a bit broken... MS documentation (even from website)
is not correct and unixODBC seems to rely to SIZEOF_LONG (which can be
undefined...). However I would like to know if problem is in unixODBC or
in FreeTDS...

> There are two outstanding items:
>
> 1. Status of two ODBC unit tests that fail in Bill's Solaris
> environment.

Same as above. I'd like to know if fail came from a core or from a
error. I hope a core (usually faster to fix :) )
Anyone know a shell tunnelling program? I would like to test freetds
using SF compile farm but there seem to be no mssql :)

> 2. The new rows-affected bug report.
>
> I will create an 0.62 branch in CVS, probably tonight. If
> we're able to fix #2 very soon, it shouldn't be hard to add
> it to both branches. If the solution is more than trivial,
> we can offer 0.62.1 later. If we decide to pull the unit
> tests, it won't be hard to remove them from the release only.
>
>
> All systems are go. Expect 0.62 on Monday morning.
>

freddy77




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page