freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] Whose bug is it?
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:01:47 +0100
>
> I'm using Ruby/ODBC with FreeTDS (connecting to a MSSQL server), and
> I've discovered a bug. The only problem is, I'm having difficulty
> determining whose bug it is...
>
> Here's some code:
>
> require 'odbc'
>
> db = ODBC::connect("sedev", "", "")
> db.do("DROP TABLE test") rescue nil
> db.do("CREATE TABLE test (tid INTEGER IDENTITY, thing INTEGER)")
> db.do("INSERT INTO test (thing) VALUES (1234)")
> db.do("INSERT INTO test (thing) VALUES (?)", 1234)
> s = db.run("SELECT * FROM test")
> while(row = s.fetch)
> p row
> end
> s.drop
>
> Output:
>
> ntalbott@proxytest:~/cvs/se-2/se/src$ ruby t2.rb
> ["1", 1234]
> ["2", 1]
>
> (If you want to get your hands on Ruby/ODBC, check out
> http://www.ch-werner.de/rubyodbc/. I'm actually using a newer,
> pre-release version, but I don't think anythings changed that affects
> this problem.)
>
> The issue centers around FreeTDS not supporting
> SQLDescribeParam. This
> is valid, and Ruby/ODBC simply marks the parameter as SQL_VARCHAR. So
> far so good. Next Ruby/ODBC sees that the type being bound to the
> column is a (Ruby) integer, and so it marks the C type of the
> parameter
> as SQL_C_LONG. That should be right, too. Then Ruby/ODBC sets
> to 1 the
> StrLen_or_IndPtr argument (FreeTDS names the argument pcbValue) of
> _SQLBindParameter. The issue seems to be that FreeTDS (or MSSQL?)
> truncates the value based on this last argument after casting from a
> SQL_C_LONG to a SQL_VARCHAR. Meaning I end up with 1 instead of 1234.
>
> The question is, is Ruby/ODBC wrong to set the length to 1? Or is
> FreeTDS wrong to use that value and truncate the value. I'm leaning
> towards the latter, but I'm having difficulty figuring out
> where to fix
> FreeTDS.
>
> Any ideas? I can give you a TDSDUMP if that would help.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Nathaniel
>
Hi Nathaniel!
Yes, this can be true. Your description is very accurate. Ruby is
correct, FreeTDS not, ODBC should ignore length if SQL_C_LONG is used.
Can you send please TDSDUMP and ODBC trace?
However I think your problem is related to 0.61 version that converts
always prepared statement in sql statements, the problem should not
occour in CVS version. If you are using Linux/FreeBSD (that contain good
iconv library) can you test with snapshot?
freddy77
-
[freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/05/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/05/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/08/2003
- Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?, Nathaniel Talbott, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/06/2003
-
Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
Nathaniel Talbott, 12/05/2003
-
RE: [freetds] Whose bug is it?,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 12/09/2003
- Re: [freetds] Whose bug is it?, Nathaniel Talbott, 12/09/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.