Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: [freetds] __func__ vs. __FUNCTION__

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [freetds] __func__ vs. __FUNCTION__
  • Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:51:44 +0100

> >
> > IIRC, this won't work. __FUNCTION__ is not "real" defined
> macro and it
> > cannot be checked by #ifdef, at least gcc manual says so.
>
> I see. Quite right, as a simple test program shows:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> int main()
> {
> #ifdef __FUNCTION__
> char msg[] = "__FUNCTION__\n";
> #else
> char msg[] = "no __FUNCTION__\n";
> #endif
> puts(msg);
> }
>
> Looks like a job for AC_TRY_COMPILE. If we want to use the
> feature at all. :-/
>

IMHO replacing __func__/__FUNCTION__ manually with real function name is
the best solution...

freddy77




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page