freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

[freetds] 0.61 release (was Re: cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?)

From: Craig Davison <cd AT securityfocus.com>
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [freetds] 0.61 release (was Re: cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:41:54 -0700

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:49:17AM -0500, James K. Lowden wrote:
> We're about to release 0.61rc2, meaning that version 0.61 is due out
> shortly (very likely in the next 2 weeks).

Would the release be contingent on fixing the ODBC bug I found (assuming it's
not a problem
specific to my version of unixODBC), or is the ODBC driver not considered
mature enough that
the bug is a showstopper?

(On that note, I'm wondering if anyone else is able to reproduce the bug!)

Thanks,

--
Craig Davison
Symantec Corporation
+1 (403) 213-3939 ext. 228

[freetds] cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?, Mickael Faivre-Macon, 02/13/2003
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?, James K. Lowden, 02/13/2003
  - Re: [freetds] cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?, Mickael Faivre-Macon, 02/14/2003
    - Re: [freetds] cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?, James K. Lowden, 02/14/2003
      - [freetds] 0.61 release (was Re: cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?), Craig Davison, 02/14/2003
        
        Re: [freetds] 0.61 release (was Re: cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?), Frediano Ziglio, 02/14/2003
        
        Re: [freetds] 0.61 release (was Re: cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?), Frediano Ziglio, 02/14/2003
        
        Re: [freetds] 0.61 release (was Re: cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?), Craig Davison, 02/14/2003
      - Re: [freetds] cspublic.h does not declare cs_ctx_alloc and alike ?, Mickael Faivre-Macon, 02/14/2003