FreeTDS Development Group

[Frediano Ziglio <freddyz77 AT tin.it>]

Il ven, 2003-01-03 alle 16:56, Lowden, James K ha scritto:
> > From: Frediano Ziglio [mailto:freddyz77 AT tin.it]
> > Sent: January 3, 2003 4:25 AM
> > > > Yes but this broke ODBC code.
> > > > ODBC do not expect status returned as ROW, only binding result...
> > > 
> > > What unittest, what line number, did I break?  libtds 
> > > manufactures the row,
> > > but only ct-lib knows to go looking for it 
> > 
> > Simply ODBC and dblib do not expect a row after 
> > STATUS_RESULT, so you have to discard this row...
> > Other solution is to more row creation in ctlib (IMHO the best method)
> 
> Frediano, Can you tell me exactly what's wrong?  Looking at the ODBC code, I
> don't see that I broke anything.  The row doesn't show up automatically;
> ct-lib has to set a flag and go find it.  If ODBC is being surprised
> somehow, I'm sure it will be easy to remedy.  
> 
> Regards (and Happy New Year), 
> 

Happy new year too!

It's true (ODBC never has possibility to read the row) but API like 
SQLDescribeCol return information about this strange "ghost" row...

freddy77