FreeTDS Development Group

["Lowden, James K" <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com>]

> From: Frediano Ziglio [mailto:freddyz77 AT tin.it]
> Sent: January 3, 2003 4:25 AM
> > > Yes but this broke ODBC code.
> > > ODBC do not expect status returned as ROW, only binding result...
> > 
> > What unittest, what line number, did I break?  libtds 
> > manufactures the row,
> > but only ct-lib knows to go looking for it 
> 
> Simply ODBC and dblib do not expect a row after 
> STATUS_RESULT, so you have to discard this row...
> Other solution is to more row creation in ctlib (IMHO the best method)

Frediano, Can you tell me exactly what's wrong?  Looking at the ODBC code, I
don't see that I broke anything.  The row doesn't show up automatically;
ct-lib has to set a flag and go find it.  If ODBC is being surprised
somehow, I'm sure it will be easy to remedy.  

Regards (and Happy New Year), 

--jkl




The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or
instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying
out such orders and/or instructions.