FreeTDS Development Group

["Castellano, Nicholas" <Nicholas_Castellano AT acml.com>]

I see your point, but I don't like the idea of having to maintain the same
information in multiple places.  It will only lead to discrepancies and
bugs, and a loss of clarity.

Cheers,
--nick

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-freetds-145195 AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
[mailto:bounce-freetds-145195 AT franklin.oit.unc.edu] 
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:29 AM
To: TDS Development Group
Subject: [freetds] RE: Proposed change


> 
> I don't understand...can you elaborate some more on what you
> want to do, and
> why?
> 

ok
> 
> 1) header
> Why we do not remove the need for tds.h. I think we can 
> redeclare needed
> structure and constant and check that those structure are the 
> same during
> compile process.
> 

The intention is to use tds.h only for accessing to libtds, not for ctlib or
dblib (odbc use always his headers).
Now including ctlib header you include all libtds stuff information.


The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or
instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying
out such orders and/or instructions.