freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Bob Kline <bkline AT rksystems.com>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Non portable code
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:45:51 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Lowden, James K wrote:
> For the record, Microsoft ships:
>
> int _vsnprintf( char *buffer, size_t count, const char *format, va_list
> argptr );
>
> Not a few ANSI-standard functions have an underscore prepended to
> them in Microsoft's implementation. I've never seen their
> rationale.
I assume it's just a question of lagging behind the standards committees
(vsnprintf wasn't in the original ANSI C standard, and it probably still
isn't part of the standard C++ library). I don't think you'll find many
vendors putting out documents with the word "rationale" in their titles
to explain why their products are out of date. :->}
--
Bob Kline
mailto:bkline AT rksystems.com
http://www.rksystems.com
-
RE: Non portable code
, (continued)
- RE: Non portable code, ZIGLIO Frediano, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Jonas Benjaminsson, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, ZIGLIO Frediano, 10/02/2002
- Re: Non portable code, Brian Bruns, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Brian Bruns, 10/02/2002
- Re: Non portable code, Castellano, Nicholas, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Lowden, James K, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Jonas Benjaminsson, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Castellano, Nicholas, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Lowden, James K, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Bob Kline, 10/02/2002
- RE: Non portable code, Lowden, James K, 10/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.