freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Thompson, Bill D (London)" <ThompBil AT exchange.uk.ml.com>
- To: "'TDS Development Group'" <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: One for Brian, I think...
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:31:24 +0100
Is the "latest snapshot" still being updated nightly ?
that's how I usually grab the latest...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Castellano, Nicholas [SMTP:Nicholas_Castellano AT acml.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:27 PM
> To: TDS Development Group
> Subject: [freetds] Re: One for Brian, I think...
>
> Two comments from the peanut gallery:
>
> - Why not just add the flags to the CS_CONTEXT directly? From an
> application, CS_CONTEXT is opaque, so it shouldn't matter too much if it
> is
> changed.
>
> - I've already touched this section of the code. Any chance you could
> update from CVS before making your changes? Otherwise, merging your stuff
> in is going to be painful.
>
> Cheers,
> --nick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounce-freetds-145195 AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> [mailto:bounce-freetds-145195 AT franklin.oit.unc.edu]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:25 AM
> To: TDS Development Group
> Subject: [freetds] Re: One for Brian, I think...
>
>
> From first blush it looks like the right and proper thing to do. You have
> my blessing (like you need it!).
>
> Brian
>
> > ...although please feel free to chip in if you have a view...
> >
> > I'm wanting to implement some of the ct-library option flags that can
> > be manipulated with ct_config(), a function that is currently
> > unimplemented.
> >
> > In order to do this, I'm going to need somewhere to store them. I
> > thought I'd ask your opinion, as I'm not *really* an expert in the
> > ct-library code.
> >
> > ct_config() is defined as follows:
> >
> > CS_RETCODE ct_config(CS_CONTEXT *ctx, CS_INT action, CS_INT property,
> > CS_VOID *buffer, CS_INT buflen, CS_INT *outlen)
> >
> > given this, it seemd logical to me to store these flags somewhere in
> > the CS_CONTEXT structure. This is currenty defined as follows:
> >
> > typedef struct cs_context
> > {
> > CS_INT date_convert_fmt;
> > int (*_clientmsg_cb)(void*, void*, void*);
> > int (*_servermsg_cb)(void*, void*, void*);
> > TDSCONTEXT *tds_ctx;
> > } CS_CONTEXT;
> >
> > As these flags are for ct-library only. It made sense to me to store
> > them in the CS_CONTEXT structure itself, rather than the TDSCONTEXT
> > structure therein.
> >
> > So, what I propose to do is as follows:
> >
> > typedef struct cs_config
> > {
> > short cs_expose_formats;
> > } CS_CONFIG;
> >
> > typedef struct cs_context
> > {
> > CS_INT date_convert_fmt;
> > int (*_clientmsg_cb)(void*, void*, void*);
> > int (*_servermsg_cb)(void*, void*, void*);
> > TDSCONTEXT *tds_ctx;
> > CS_CONFIG config;
> > } CS_CONTEXT;
> >
> > where "cs_expose_formats" is the particular flag I am interested in
> > implementing at the moment. More would be added to the CS_CONFIG
> > structure as and when we support them.
> >
> > I'd like to get your opinion on whether I've done the right thing.
> >
> > Bill
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: [Nicholas_Castellano AT acml.com]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
>
>
> The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
> confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or
> agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
> review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication
> is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> original message. Please note that for certain accounts we do not accept
> orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and for those accounts we will not
> be
> responsible for carrying out such orders and/or instructions. Kindly
> refrain
> from sending orders or instructions by e-mail unless you have confirmed
> that
> we accept such communications for your account. Please also note that to
> satisfy regulatory requirements we review the outgoing and incoming e-mail
> correspondence of staff members serving certain functions.
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: [thompbil AT exchange.uk.ml.com]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
-
One for Brian, I think...,
Bill Thompson, 09/27/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: One for Brian, I think..., Brian Bruns, 09/27/2002
- Re: One for Brian, I think..., Castellano, Nicholas, 09/27/2002
- Re: One for Brian, I think..., Thompson, Bill D (London), 09/27/2002
- Re: One for Brian, I think..., Brian Bruns, 09/27/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.