FreeTDS Development Group

["Castellano, Nicholas" <Nicholas_Castellano AT acml.com>]

It does free the allocated memory within the structure.  But if the name
offends your sense of aesthetics, I won't object if you change it.  The
libtds ABI police may have a different opinion though :-)

Cheers,
--nick

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-freetds-145195 AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
[mailto:bounce-freetds-145195 AT franklin.oit.unc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:38 AM
To: TDS Development Group
Subject: [freetds] RE: shared object version numbers

Agree. Altough I don't like a "free" function that do not free the given
pointer...
If we don't require a "free" I rather call it "reset"...


The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
original message. Please note that for certain accounts we do not accept
orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and for those accounts we will not be
responsible for carrying out such orders and/or instructions. Kindly refrain
from sending orders or instructions by e-mail unless you have confirmed that
we accept such communications for your account. Please also note that to
satisfy regulatory requirements we review the outgoing and incoming e-mail
correspondence of staff members serving certain functions.