FreeTDS Development Group

["Varley, David(CBorn at Alcoa)" <David.Varley AT alcoa.com.au>]

Well spotted, thanks Freddy. Worked for me after I made
just 1 change.

__digital__ is not defined on my system, but __osf__ is
defined by both gcc and the standard cc compilers.
I changed the defined (__digital__) to defined (__osf__)
in threadsafe.c and it passed all tests against JDBC.

Could you please adjust the CVS version? I don't know if
anything uses the __digital__, if so you may have to || the
checks.

David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frediano Ziglio [mailto:freddyz77 AT tin.it]
> Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 4:28 AM
> To: TDS Development Group
> Subject: [freetds] RE: configure bombs on DU 4.0
> 
> 
> Il gio, 2002-09-12 alle 10:59, Varley, David(CBorn at Alcoa) 
> ha scritto:
> > Freddy,
> > 
> > Tests 1-6 core-dump, 7 and 8 both pass.
> > No freetds.log is generated, but here's a run of t0001 with
> > resulting core-dump, foloowed by stack traces using first gdb
> > and then dbx (which seems to grok the libc symbols better).
> > 
> > Parameters to gethostbyaddr_r look a bit odd, right number,
> > but strange values. If tds_gethostbyaddr_r is passing a
> > structure address as the last parameter, how can it be 0 ?
> > 
> 
> If you try corrent CVS should work now.
> Simply for tru64 I call "normal" api (already thread safe)
> 
> freddy77
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: 
> [David.Varley AT alcoa.com.au]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to 
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
>