FreeTDS Development Group

[Brian Bruns <camber AT ais.org>]

On 24 Aug 2002, Frediano Ziglio wrote:

> Il sab, 2002-08-24 alle 13:26, Brian Bruns ha scritto:
> > On 24 Aug 2002, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > > Il sab, 2002-08-24 alle 09:09, James K.Lowden ha scritto:
> > > > Contributors, 
> > > > 
> > > > There are several places in e.g. tds/convert.c that use comparisons to
> > > > very strange decimal numbers.  I'd like to see us use hex instead, 
> > > > when
> > > > we're looking for overflow conditions and such.  
> > > 
> > > Sound right..
> > > Perhaps should best to add a CodingStyle document to FreeTDS...
> > 
> > http://www.freetds.org/CodingStyle
> >
> 
> Should be
>       switch(x) {
>       case XXX:
>               ...
>               break;
>       ...
>       }
> or
>       switch(x) {
>               case XXX:
>                       ...
>                       break;
>               ...
>       }
> ?
> (I prefer first type)

Most code is written in the second style.  I personally don't care as long 
as we are all doing the same thing on this.  Time for a straw poll?

> 
> struct XXX {
>       ...
> };
> or
> struct XXX
> {
>       ...
> };
> ?
> (I prefer second type)

Second type it is. All the typedefs in the header files do this, although 
I notice some recent code going with the first style.  I'll make some 
notes in the doc.

> freddy77
> 
>